IntroductionPrimary hyperparathyroidism is a common endocrine disorder characterized by elevated parathyroid hormone levels, which cause continuous osteoclastic bone resorption. Giant cell tumor of bone is an expansile osteolytic tumor that contains numerous osteoclast-like giant cells. There are many similarities in the radiological and histological features of giant cell tumor of bone and brown tumor. This is a rare benign focal osteolytic process most commonly caused by hyperparathyroidism.Case presentationWe report the unusual case of a 40-year-old Caucasian woman in which primary hyperparathyroidism was diagnosed after surgical ablation of a costal mass. The mass was suspected of being neoplastic and histopathology was compatible with a giant cell tumor of bone. On the basis of the biochemical results (including serum calcium, phosphorous and intact parathyroid hormone levels) primary hyperparathyroidism was suspected and a brown tumor secondary to refractory hyperparathyroidism was diagnosed.ConclusionsSince giant cell tumor is a bone neoplasm that has major implications for the patient, the standard laboratory tests in patients with bone lesions are important for a correct diagnosis.

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) and inferior vena cava syndrome (IVCS) represent a severe symptomatic complication of some malignant tumors. Although radiation therapy and chemotherapy are elective, symptomatic relief takes 7-10 days to be achieved, and poor symptomatic benefit can be obtained in relapsed or resistant tumors. We report on a palliative approach using Wallstent catheters placed percutaneously in a series of 16 patients. Results obtained in relief of symptoms were excellent (complete response of cephalea, jugular enlargement, and collateral circulation achieved in 100% [16/16] of patients; complete response of edema obtained in 93% [15/16] of patients). Achievement of symptomatic response was obtained for all symptoms during the first 24 h poststenting, except for edema and dyspnea. Mean duration of patency of the stents was 6.4 months (range 2-17 months). Rates of morbidity and complications were very low. Dyspnea was a quite resistant symptom, and only four of 13 patients (31%) obtained complete response, while partial improvement was obtained in the other nine (79%). However, placement of the stents does not preclude the use of radiation therapy or chemotherapy. We think that these results and those from other studies warrant larger multicentric trials.

No abstract

No abstract