Molecular mechanisms of azole resistance in Candida albicans, including alterations in the target enzyme and increased efflux of drug, have been described, but the epidemiology of the resistance mechanisms has not been established. We have investigated the molecular mechanisms of resistance to azoles in C. albicans strains displaying high-level fluconazole resistance (MICs, >64 g/ml) isolated from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. The levels of expression of genes encoding lanosterol 14␣-demethylase (ERG11) and efflux transporters (MDR1 and CDR) implicated in azole resistance were monitored in matched sets of susceptible and resistant isolates. In addition, ERG11 genes were amplified by PCR, and their nucleotide sequences were determined in order to detect point mutations with a possible effect in the affinity for azoles. The analysis confirmed the multifactorial nature of azole resistance and the prevalence of these mechanisms of resistance in C. albicans clinical isolates exhibiting frank fluconazole resistance, with a predominance of overexpression of genes encoding efflux pumps, detected in 85% of all resistant isolates, being found. Alterations in the target enzyme, including functional amino acid substitutions and overexpression of the gene that encodes the enzyme, were detected in 65 and 35% of the isolates, respectively. Overall, multiple mechanisms of resistance were combined in 75% of the isolates displaying high-level fluconazole resistance. These results may help in the development of new strategies to overcome the problem of resistance as well as new treatments for this condition.
Dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP), an important odontoblast differentiation marker, is necessary for tooth development and mineralization. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) plays a vital role in odontoblast function via diverse signal transduction systems. We hypothesize that BMP2 regulates DSPP gene transcription and thus odontoblast differentiation. Here we report that expression of BMP2 and DSPP is detected during mouse odontogenesis by in situ hybridization assay, and BMP2 up-regulates DSPP mRNA and protein expression as well as DSPP-luciferase promoter activity in mouse preodontoblasts. By sequentially deleting fragments of the mouse DSPP promoter, we show that a BMP2-response element is located between nucleotides ؊97 and ؊72. Tooth development involves sequential and reciprocal interaction between dental epithelial and mesenchymal cells. The formation of dentin or dentinogenesis originates from the neural crest-derived mesenchymal cells and proceeds in a series of cytodifferentiation stages to form odontoblasts in a specific spatial and temporal pattern originating at the principal cusp tip and advancing toward the base of the tooth (1-3). A consequence of odontoblast cytodifferentiation is the expression of specific gene products that form the dentin extracellular matrix. Dentin extracellular matrix is composed of the inorganic components with mostly hydroxyapatite (about 70%) and the organic matrix that consists of collagenous and noncollagenous proteins (NCPs).2 Among the NCPs, dentin sialoprotein (DSP) and dentin phosphoprotein (DPP) are expressed at high levels in tooth, especially in dentin (4, 5). DSP accounts for 5-8% of the NCPs with high carbohydrate and sialic acid levels, whereas DPP is the principal dentin matrix protein with about 50% of the NCPs. DPP, with high levels of aspartic acid and phosphoserine, is believed to be a nucleator or modulator of function related to dentin mineralization and hydroxyapatite crystal formation (6 -8).
Candida dubliniensis is an opportunistic yeast that has been increasingly implicated in oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients but may be underreported due to its similarity with Candida albicans. Although most C. dubliniensis isolates are susceptible to fluconazole, the inducibility of azole resistance in vitro has been reported. Thus, the use of fluconazole prophylaxis in the treatment of these patients may have contributed to the increasing rates of isolation of C. dubliniensis. In this study, yeast strains were collected from the oral cavities of HIV-infected patients enrolled in a longitudinal study of OPC. Patients received fluconazole for the suppression or treatment of OPC, and isolates collected at both study entry and end of study were chosen for analysis. Samples were plated on CHROMagar Candida medium for initial isolation and further identified by Southern blot analysis with the species-specific probes Ca3 (for C. albicans) and Cd25 (for C. dubliniensis). Fluconazole MICs were determined by using NCCLS methods. At study entry, susceptible C. albicans isolates were recovered from oral samples in 42 patients who were followed longitudinally (1 to 36 months). C. albicans strains from 12 of these patients developed fluconazole resistance (fluconazole MIC, >64 g/ml). C. dubliniensis was not detected at end of study in any of these patients. Of the remaining 30 patients, eight (27%) demonstrated a replacement of C. albicans by C. dubliniensis when a comparison of isolates obtained at baseline and those from the last culture was done. For the 22 of these 30 patients in whom no switch in species was detected, the fluconazole MICs for initial and end-of-study C. albicans isolates ranged from 0.125 to 2.0 g/ml. For the eight patients in whom a switch to C. dubliniensis was detected, the fluconazole MICs for C. dubliniensis isolates at end of study ranged from 0.25 to 64 g/ml: the fluconazole MICs for isolates from six patients were 0.25 to 2.0 g/ml and those for the other two were 32 and 64 g/ml, respectively. In conclusion, a considerable number of patients initially infected with C. albicans strains that failed to develop fluconazole resistance demonstrated a switch to C. dubliniensis. C. dubliniensis in this setting may be underestimated due to lack of identification and may occur due to the impact of fluconazole on the ecology of oral yeast species.
Candida dubliniensis is a newly identified species of Candida that is phenotypically similar to but genetically distinct from C. albicans. This organism has been recovered with increasing frequency from the oral cavities of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and AIDS patients and has been implicated as a causative agent of oral candidiasis and systemic disease. In the present study we characterized the molecular mechanisms of resistance to fluconazole (FLC) in C. dubliniensis clinical isolates from two different HIV-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Isolates were identified to the species level by phenotypic and genotypic tests. DNA-typing techniques were used to assess strain identity. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by NCCLS techniques. Northern blotting analysis was used to monitor the expression of genes encoding lanosterol demethylase (ERG11) and efflux transporters (CDR and MDR1) in matched sets of C. dubliniensis-susceptible and -resistant isolates by using probes generated from their homologous C. albicans sequences. In addition, ERG11 genes were amplified by PCR, and their nucleotide sequences were determined in order to detect point mutations with a possible effect in the affinity for azoles. Decreasing susceptibilities to FLC were detected in C. dubliniensis isolates recovered from both patients during the course of treatment. FLC-resistant C. dubliniensis isolates from one patient demonstrated combined upregulation of the MDR1, CDR1, and ERG11 genes. Among the isolates from the second patient, all isolates showing decreased susceptibility to FLC demonstrated upregulation of MDR1, whereas the levels of mRNA for the ERG11 genes remained constant and the expression of CDR genes was negligible. Fourteen point mutations were found in the ERG11 genes of the isolates with decreased susceptibility to FLC. These data demonstrate that the development of azole resistance in C. dublinensis clinical isolates from HIV-infected patients treated with FLC is mediated by multiple molecular mechanisms of resistance, similar to the observations found in the case of C. albicans.
Molecular mechanisms of azole resistance in Candida albicans include alterations in the target enzyme and increased efflux of drug, but the impact of specific treatment regimens on resistance has not been established. A patient with advanced AIDS was enrolled in a longitudinal study to receive continuous oral fluconazole (FLU) 200 mg/day for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidosis (OPC). Oral cultures were obtained at time of enrollment, during episodes of OPC and quarterly for surveillance. The patient had five symptomatic relapses on continuous FLU during 43 months. All OPC episodes were successfully treated with increasing doses of FLU although increased FLU MICs were detected for C. albicans isolates with progression of time. DNA-typing techniques demonstrated that resistance developed in a persistent strain of C. albicans. Both FLU-resistant and isogenic isolates with reduced susceptibility were detected in the same clinical samples through multiple episodes. Analysis of molecular mechanisms of resistance revealed overexpression of MDR and CDR genes encoding efflux pumps (but not ERG11) in isolates with decreased FLU susceptibility. In addition, the presence of the G464S amino acid substitution in their lanosterol demethylase, affecting its affinity for FLU, was also detected. However, other isogenic, but FLU-susceptible isolates recovered from the same samples did not harbour the mutation, indicating microevolution of yeast populations within the oral cavity. In this patient, the continuous antifungal pressure exerted by FLU resulted in development of resistance of multifactorial nature. Despite their clonal origin, different subpopulations of C. albicans demonstrated distinct resistance mechanisms, including concomitant presence and absence of functional point mutations in ERG11 genes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.