No abstract

Welfare reforms often focus on stimulating employment among benefit recipients, based on the theoretical mechanism that the performance of low income work will serve as a stepping stone towards financial self-sufficiency. Alternative theories, however, argue that the acceptance of low income work will reduce job search intensity and can signal low productivity, and therefore will not enable people to support themselves. Using longitudinal administrative data and discrete time linear probability models, we follow all social assistance recipients in the Netherlands from 2010 to 2015, and analyse whether, and for whom, low income work functions as a stepping stone towards sustainable self-sufficiency. We find that social assistance recipients are more likely to become self-sufficient when they are active in low income work. This stepping stone effect applies in particular to benefit recipients with limited work experience, a higher educational level, a shorter duration of welfare receipt and to those who belong to the native Dutch majority. The type of employment also matters: low income work through temporary employment agencies is found to be the most effective stepping stone towards self-sufficiency.

This study analyses the impact of the neighbourhood context on the likelihood that refugees move from social assistance to paid employment. It makes use of Dutch policy that resulted in an exogenous placement of refugees in their first regular housing. This natural quasi-experiment allows us to estimate intent-to-treat effects of initial neighbourhood characteristics on the likelihood of transitioning from welfare to work. We consider the impact of the employment share and the median level of income among natives and co-ethnics, using Dutch longitudinal administrative data and discrete time event-history modelling. Our findings indicate that refugees are more likely to enter the labour market when the neighbourhood’s employment share among natives is higher. A similar effect for employment among co-ethnics is not found. There is also no evidence that the placement of refugees in an area with a higher median income among co-ethnics or natives facilitates the transition from welfare to work.

This study contributes to the previous literature by examining how flexible work arrangements interact with work and family time claims to affect burnout. It does so by providing a theoretical framework and empirical test of the interaction of flexibility with the effect of work and family time claims on burnout. Hypotheses and predictions based on previous literature are tested by Ordinary Least Squared regression models using data from the Time Competition Survey, constituting a sample of 1,058 employees of 89 function groups within 30 organizations. We found no main effects of work and family time claims or flexible work arrangements on burnout. However, the results do show an interaction of flexible working hours with the effect of work and family time claims on burnout. Specifically, the higher an individual's work and family time claims, the more this person benefits from having flexible working hours. In general, the results support the proposition that the relationship between work and family time claims and burnout differs for individuals with different levels of flexible work arrangements.