Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone cancer in children and, unfortunately, is associated with poor survival rates. OS most commonly arises around the knee joint, and was traditionally treated with amputation until surgeons began to favour limb-preserving surgery in the 1990s. Whilst improving functional outcomes, this was not without problems, such as implant failure and limb length discrepancies. OS can also arise in areas such as the pelvis, spine, head, and neck, which creates additional technical difficulty given the anatomical complexity of the areas. We reviewed the literature and summarised the recent advances in OS surgery. Improvements have been made in many areas; developments in pre-operative imaging technology have allowed improved planning, whilst the ongoing development of intraoperative imaging techniques, such as fluorescent dyes, offer the possibility of improved surgical margins. Technological developments, such as computer navigation, patient specific instruments, and improved implant design similarly provide the opportunity to improve patient outcomes. Going forward, there are a number of promising avenues currently being pursued, such as targeted fluorescent dyes, robotics, and augmented reality, which bring the prospect of improving these outcomes further.

No abstract

Background: Sarcomas are rare, aggressive cancers which can occur in any region of the body. Surgery is usually the cornerstone of curative treatment, with negative surgical margins associated with decreased local recurrence and improved overall survival. Indocyanine green (ICG) is a fluorescent dye which accumulates in sarcoma tissue and can be imaged intraoperatively using handheld near-infrared (NIR) cameras, theoretically helping guide the surgeon’s resection margins. Methods: Patients operated on between 20 February 2019 and 20 October 2021 for intermediate to high grade sarcomas at our centres received either conventional surgery, or were administered ICG pre-operatively followed by intra-operative NIR fluorescence guidance during the procedure. Differences between the unexpected positive margin rates were compared. Results: 115 suitable patients were identified, of which 39 received ICG + NIR fluorescence guided surgery, and 76 received conventional surgery. Of the patients given ICG, 37/39 tumours fluoresced, and surgeons felt the procedure was guided by the intra-operative images in 11 cases. Patients receiving ICG had a lower unexpected positive margin rate (5.1% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.01). Conclusions: The use of NIR fluorescence cameras in combination with ICG may reduce the unexpected positive margin rate for high grade sarcomas. A prospective, multi-centre randomised control trial is now needed to validate these results.

Background Early vascular complications following pancreatic transplantation are not uncommon (3%–8%). Typically, cross‐sectional imaging is requested in response to clinical change. We instituted a change in protocol to request imaging pre‐emptively to identify patients with thrombotic complications. Methods In 2013, protocol computer tomography angiography (CTA) at days 3–5 and day 10 following pancreas transplantation was introduced. A retrospective analysis of all pancreas transplants performed at our institution from January 2001 to May 2019 was undertaken. Results A total of 115 patients received pancreas transplants during this time period. A total of 78 received pancreas transplant without routine CTA and 37 patients with the new protocol. Following the change in protocol, we detected a high number of subclinical thromboses (41.7%). There was a significant decrease in invasive intervention for thrombosis (78.6% before vs 30.8% after, p = .02), and graft survival was significantly higher (61.5% before vs 86.1% after, p = .04). There was also a significant reduction in the number of graft failures (all‐cause) where thrombosis was present (23.4% before vs 5.6% after, p = .02). Patient survival was unaffected (p = .48). Conclusions Implementation of early protocol CTA identifies a large number of patients with subclinical graft thromboses that are more amenable to conservative management and significantly reduces the requirement for invasive intervention.