Objectives: To present a synopsis of evidence on the efficacy of rehabilitation after cervical disk surgery performed for neck pain and radiculopathy. Data sources: The databases of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched for studies reporting effects of rehabilitation interventions in patients undergoing surgery due to cervical disk disease with pain and radicular syndrome, published before 31 August 2018. Review methods: Project was registered with PROSPERO database (number CRD42018085937). Randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of rehabilitation interventions versus other, sham, or no treatment were selected. The primary outcomes were disability and pain. Secondary outcomes were other measures assessing biological, psychological or social effect of rehabilitation. Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Evaluation of evidence was performed with the GRADE system. Results: Five papers were included in the review. The eligible studies were heterogeneous in intervention and outcome reporting. There are low- to very-low-quality evidence that some interventions (use of cervical collars after non-plated anterior cervical diskectomy an fusion, structured physiotherapy, and interactive patients’ education) provide some benefit within functioning, pain, and selected psychological variables in patients undergoing cervical disk surgery. Controlled trials addressing comprehensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation, multidisciplinary pain management, occupational therapy, psychotherapy, social and vocational interventions were not identified. Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence with few trials of low quality to allow any conclusion to be drawn about the effectiveness, harms, and general ineffectiveness of rehabilitation for people who have had cervical disk surgery for pain or radiculopathy.

Following injuries of the cervical spinal cord at the common level with C6 neurological level sparing, abduction of the shoulder and elbow flexion remain active. The flexors of the elbow are controlled by the musculocutaneous nerve formed mainly from C5 and C6 fibers, the motor cells of which are usually located above the level of the spinal lesion. The encouraging report of anastomosis of the musculocutaneous nerve to the median nerve, described by Benassy and Robart, induced us to perform similar operations in 42 patients with traumatic tetraplegia. In 32 patients this has restored simple grasping function of the hand, increasing the patients' independence. The operation is particularly indicated in cases of complete lesion of the spinal cord at the C6-C7 level in young people, and for best results should be performed with in the first few months after trauma.

Appropriate health knowledge (HK) and health perceptions (HP) of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) are linked to health-related behaviors, compliance, the involvement of caregivers and efficacy of prophylaxis, and management of secondary conditions. The significance of factors determining the efficacy of educational interventions in patients with SCI is underestimated. This systematic literature review aims at identification of determinants of HK and HP among patients with SCI. We identified 16 papers with quantitative HK and HP measurements conclusive in the identification of HK and HP determinants in individuals with SCI. Better HK and HP correlated with health condition-related variables (traumatic SCI, history of secondary conditions, except depression), body functions and structures (tetraplegia, incomplete deficit), activities (independence in daily living activities, ability of locomotion on a wheelchair, inability to walk), social and vocational participation, environmental factors (access to a computer with Internet connection, living in a big city, being married, healthcare recently received), and personal factors (younger age among adults, living with SCI for a longer time, younger age at SCI onset, higher educational level, internal locus of control). Limitations encountered included high nonresponse rates among the patients enrolled, and use of heterogeneous and nonvalidated tools. The results of these studies do not cover the entire scope of possible interactions and exclusively apply univariate correlations. The paucity and methodological limitations of studies conclusive in the identification of HK and HP determinants in SCI patients and the development of new approaches to information and education warrant more high-quality research on the basis of multivariate analyses.

Risk factors for IDRD in SINC patients include complete neurological deficit, short time elapsing from SINC, referral from a hospital, referral from a surgical department, thoracic spinal lesion, and multiple co-morbidities.

No abstract