IntroductionEarly safe discharge is paramount for the success of ERAS following colorectal cancer resections. Anastomotic leakage (AL) has high morbidity, particularly if the patient has been discharged to the community.AimTo evaluate whether C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) can predict AL before early discharge.Material and methodsFifty-five consecutive patients undergoing open and robotic colorectal cancer resections were included. C-reactive protein and PCT were measured pre-operatively, 8 h after incision, and on the first and third postoperative day. Thirty-day readmissions, re-operations and mortality were recorded.ResultsTwenty-nine patients underwent robotic and the remainder open (n = 26) resections. Five patients had AL. The mean CRP and PCT increased on postoperative day 1 (POD 1) and POD 3 in all patients. On POD 3, mean CRP was 114 mg/l in non-AL patients and 321 mg/l in AL patients (p = 0.0001). Mean PCT on POD 3 was 0.56 ng/ml in the non-AL group and 10.4 ng/ml in AL patients (p = 0.017). On analysis of ROC and AUC curves, the cut-off for CRP on POD 3 was 245.64 mg/l, with 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity for AL. The cut-off for PCT on POD 3 was 3.83 ng/ml, with 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity for AL.ConclusionsC-reactive protein and PCT measurement on POD 3 following colorectal cancer resection can positively identify patients at low risk of anastomotic leakage.

Dielectric properties of breast tissue obtained from 131 patients were investigated by an open-ended probe separated from the tissue by a dielectric film (plastic foil). The film decreases the measured capacitance, but the content of blood and body liquids has little effect on the measured quantity. We found that in cancerous tissue the electric capacity (related to the permittivity) measured at f > or = 10 MHz using the modified probe is higher than that in normal tissue. The dielectric assignment was confirmed by histopathology in 94% of investigated cases. High efficiency in differentiation between normal and cancer breast tissues and the feasibility of fulfilling of aseptic conditions (a film covering the probe) are promising in intra-operative cancer diagnostics.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare robotic colorectal surgery (RCS) performed by a team having limited expertise in robotic surgery with open colorectal surgery (OCS) performed by experienced colorectal surgeons. Methods: This was a prospective comparative nonrandomized study. Results: Between March 2013 and June 2015, 79 patients with colon and rectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled into the study. Of these, 41 patients underwent OCS and 38 underwent RCS. The groups were comparable in terms of demographics and type of procedure. The RCS took significantly longer in the operating room than the OCS (222 vs. 141 min, p < 0.001). The rate of major complications was similar for both RCS and OCS (5.3 vs. 9.8%, p = 0.454). Wound infections were less frequent in the RCS group (10.5 vs. 29.3%, p = 0.039). The mean hospital stay was 1 day shorter in the RCS group than in the OCS group (5.7 vs. 6.7 days, p = 0.176). The lymph nodes harvested was comparable (14.7 RCS vs. 15.5 OCS, p = 0.596). Conclusions: This study confirmed that the surgical team with limited expertise in minimally invasive surgery can still safely introduce robotic surgery into their colorectal practice. When compared to the open approach, the robotic approach reduces hospital stay, as well as the rate of surgical site infection.

Introduction Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has rapidly emerged as a novel approach for rectal cancer surgery. Safety profiles are still emerging and more comparative data is urgently needed. This study aimed to compare indications and short‐term outcomes of TaTME, open, laparoscopic, and robotic TME internationally. Methods A pre‐planned analysis of the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) 2017 audit was performed. Patients undergoing elective total mesorectal excision (TME) for malignancy between 1 January 2017 and 15 March 2017 by any operative approach were included. The primary outcome measure was anastomotic leak. Results Of 2579 included patients, 76.2% (1966/2579) underwent TME with restorative anastomosis of which 19.9% (312/1966) had a minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or robotic) which included a transanal component (TaTME). Overall, 9.0% (175/1951, 15 missing outcome data) of patients suffered an anastomotic leak. On univariate analysis both laparoscopic TaTME (OR 1.61, 1.02–2.48, P = 0.04) and robotic TaTME (OR 3.05, 1.10–7.34, P = 0.02) were associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leak than non‐transanal laparoscopic TME. However this association was lost in the mixed‐effects model controlling for patient and disease factors (OR 1.23, 0.77–1.97, P = 0.39 and OR 2.11, 0.79–5.62, P = 0.14 respectively), whilst low rectal anastomosis (OR 2.72, 1.55–4.77, P < 0.001) and male gender (OR 2.29, 1.52–3.44, P < 0.001) remained strongly associated. The overall positive circumferential margin resection rate was 4.0%, which varied between operative approaches: laparoscopic 3.2%, transanal 3.8%, open 4.7%, robotic 1%. Conclusion This contemporaneous international snapshot shows that uptake of the TaTME approach is widespread and is associated with surgically and pathologically acceptable results.

Older persons constitute one-third of patients treated electively in colorectal departments. Colorectal surgery in geriatric patients is associated with a prolonged hospital stay and a higher potential for complications and mortality.