No abstract

The thermodynamics of small-molecule (H(2), arene, alkane, and CO) addition to pincer-ligated iridium complexes of several different configurations (three-coordinate d(8), four-coordinate d(8), and five-coordinate d(6)) have been investigated by computational and experimental means. The substituent para to the iridium (Y) has been varied in complexes containing the (Y-PCP)Ir unit (Y-PCP = eta(3)-1,3,5-C(6)H(2)[CH(2)PR(2)](2)Y; R = methyl for computations; R = tert-butyl for experiments); substituent effects have been studied for the addition of H(2), C-H, and CO to the complexes (Y-PCP)Ir, (Y-PCP)Ir(CO), and (Y-PCP)Ir(H)(2). Para substituents on arenes undergoing C-H bond addition to (PCP)Ir or to (PCP)Ir(CO) have also been varied computationally and experimentally. In general, increasing electron donation by the substituent Y in the 16-electron complexes, (Y-PCP)Ir(CO) or (Y-PCP)Ir(H)(2), disfavors addition of H-H or C-H bonds, in contradiction to the idea of such additions being oxidative. Addition of CO to the same 16-electron complexes is also disfavored by increased electron donation from Y. By contrast, addition of H-H and C-H bonds or CO to the three-coordinate parent species (Y-PCP)Ir is favored by increased electron donation. In general, the effects of varying Y are markedly similar for H(2), C-H, and CO addition. The trends can be fully rationalized in terms of simple molecular orbital interactions but not in terms of concepts related to oxidation, such as charge-transfer or electronegativity differences.

Pincer complexes of the type ((R)PCP)IrH(2), where ((R)PCP)Ir is [eta(3)-2,6-(R(2)PCH(2))(2)C(6)H(3)]Ir, are the most effective catalysts reported to date for the "acceptorless" dehydrogenation of alkanes to yield alkenes and free H(2). We calculate (DFT/B3LYP) that associative (A) reactions of ((Me)PCP)IrH(2) with model linear (propane, n-PrH) and cyclic (cyclohexane, CyH) alkanes may proceed via classical Ir(V) and nonclassical Ir(III)(eta(2)-H(2)) intermediates. A dissociative (D) pathway proceeds via initial loss of H(2), followed by C-H addition to ((Me)PCP)Ir. Although a slightly higher energy barrier (DeltaE(+ +)) is computed for the D pathway, the calculated free-energy barrier (DeltaG(+ +)) for the D pathway is significantly lower than that of the A pathway. Under standard thermodynamic conditions (STP), C-H addition via the D pathway has DeltaG(o)(+ +) = 36.3 kcal/mol for CyH (35.1 kcal/mol for n-PrH). However, acceptorless dehydrogenation of alkanes is thermodynamically impossible at STP. At conditions under which acceptorless dehydrogenation is thermodynamically possible (for example, T = 150 degrees C and P(H)2 = 1.0 x 10(-7) atm), DeltaG(+ +) for C-H addition to ((Me)PCP)Ir (plus a molecule of free H(2)) is very low (17.5 kcal/mol for CyH, 16.7 kcal/mol for n-PrH). Under these conditions, the rate-determining step for the D pathway is the loss of H(2) from ((Me)PCP)IrH(2) with DeltaG(D)(+ +) approximately DeltaH(D)(+ +) = 27.2 kcal/mol. For CyH, the calculated DeltaG(o)(+ +) for C-H addition to ((Me)PCP)IrH(2) on the A pathway is 35.2 kcal/mol (32.7 kcal/mol for n-PrH). At catalytic conditions, the calculated free energies of C-H addition are 31.3 and 33.7 kcal/mol for CyH and n-PrH addition, respectively. Elimination of H(2) from the resulting "seven-coordinate" Ir-species must proceed with an activation enthalpy at least as large as the enthalpy change of the elimination step itself (DeltaH approximately 11-13 kcal/mol), and with a small entropy of activation. The free energy of activation for H(2) elimination (DeltaG(A)(+ +)) is hence found to be greater than ca. 36 kcal/mol for both CyH and n-PrH under catalytic conditions. The overall free-energy barrier of the A pathway is calculated to be higher than that of the D pathway by ca. 9 kcal/mol. Reversible C-H(D) addition to ((R)PCP)IrH(2) is predicted to lead to H/D exchange, because the barriers for hydride scrambling are extremely low in the "seven-coordinate" polyhydrides. In agreement with calculation, H/D exchange is observed experimentally for several deuteriohydrocarbons with the following order of rates: C(6)D(6) > mesitylene-d(12) > n-decane-d(22) >> cyclohexane-d(12). Because H/D exchange in cyclohexane-d(12) solution is not observed even after 1 week at 180 degrees C, we estimate that the experimental barrier to cyclohexane C-D addition is greater than 36.4 kcal/mol. This value is considerably greater than the experimental barrier for the full catalytic dehydrogenation cycle for cycloalkanes (ca. 31 kcal/mol). Thus, the experimental ev...

(PCP)Ir(H)2 (PCP = eta3-1,3-C6H3(CH2PR2)2) complexes are highly effective catalysts for the dehydrogenation of alkanes; in particular, they are the first efficient molecular catalysts for alkane dehydrogenation that do not require a sacrificial hydrogen acceptor. Using density functional theory/effective core potential methods, we have examined C-H bond cleavage in alkanes and arenes by both (PCP)Ir and (PCP)Ir(H)2. C-H addition to the dihydride is accompanied by loss of H2; both associative and dissociative pathways for this exchange reaction have been examined. The energetic barrier (deltaE(is not equal)) for associative displacement of H2 by benzene is much lower than the barrier for a dissociative pathway involving initial loss of H2; however, the pathways have very comparable free energy barriers (deltaG(is not equal)). Extrapolation to the higher temperatures, bulkier phosphine ligands, and the alkane substrates used experimentally leads to the conclusion that the pathway for the "acceptorless" dehydrogenation of alkanes is dissociative. For hydrocarbon/hydrocarbon exchanges, which are required for transfer-dehydrogenation, dissociative pathways are calculated to be much more favorable than associative pathways. We emphasize that it is the free energy, not just the internal energy or enthalpy, that must be considered for elementary steps that show changes in molecularity.

The electronic structures of the mono- and bisammonia adducts EH3NH3 and EH3(NH3)2, E = B and Al, have been investigated using ab initio electronic structure methods. Geometries were optimized at the MP2/cc-pVTZ level. Higher-level correlated methods (MP4(SDTQ), QCISD(T), CCSD(T)), as well as the G2 and CBS-Q methods, were used to obtain accurate bond dissociation energies. The E-N bond dissociation energy (De) is computed near 33 kcal/mol (E = B) and 31 kca/mol (E = Al), respectively. Whereas the Al-N bond energy pertaining to the second ammonia molecule in AlH3(NH3)2 is 11-12 kcal/mol, only a transition-state structure may be located for the species BH3(NH3)2. We analyze factors which may distinguish Al from B with respect to the formation of stable bisamine adducts. The most significant difference relates to electronegativity and hence the propensity of boron to engage in predominantly covalent bonding, as compared with the bonding of aluminum with ammonia, which shows substantial electrostatic character. Neither steric factors nor the participation of d-orbitals is found to play an important role in differentiating aluminum from boron. The lesser electronegativity of third-row elements appears to be the critical common feature allowing the formation of hypercoordinate complexes of these elements in contrast to their second-row analogues. Consideration of some group 14 analogues and hard/soft acid/base effects supports this view.