Constraints in form regular expressions over strings are ubiquitous. They occur often in programming languages like Perl and C#, in SQL in form of LIKE expressions, and in web applications. Providing support for regular expression constraints in program analysis and testing has several useful applications. We introduce a method and a tool called Rex, for symbolically expressing and analyzing regular expression constraints. Rex is implemented using the SMT solver Z3, and we provide experimental evaluation of Rex.

Testing is one of the costliest aspects of commercial software development. Model-based testing is a promising approach addressing these deficits. At Microsoft, model-based testing technology developed by the Foundations of Software Engineering group in Microsoft Research has been used since 2003. The second generation of this tool set, Spec Explorer, deployed in 2004, is now used on a daily basis by Microsoft product groups for testing operating system components, .NET framework components and other areas. This chapter provides a comprehensive survey of the concepts of the tool and their foundations.

No abstract

Abstract. There has been significant recent interest in automated reasoning techniques, in particular constraint solvers, for string variables. These techniques support a wide variety of clients, ranging from static analysis to automated testing. The majority of string constraint solvers rely on finite automata to support regular expression constraints. For these approaches, performance depends critically on fast automata operations such as intersection, complementation, and determinization. Existing work in this area has not yet provided conclusive results as to which core algorithms and data structures work best in practice.In this paper, we study a comprehensive set of algorithms and data structures for performing fast automata operations. Our goal is to provide an apples-to-apples comparison between techniques that are used in current tools. To achieve this, we re-implemented a number of existing techniques. We use an established set of regular expressions benchmarks as an indicative workload. We also include several techniques that, to the best of our knowledge, have not yet been used for string constraint solving. Our results show that there is a substantial performance difference across techniques, which has implications for future tool design.

No abstract