The possible activation of monocytes to express tissue factor procoagulant activity (TF-PCA) during CPB (cardiopulmonary bypass) was investigated. 22 patients undergoing myocardial revascularization were randomly assigned to two groups. In group C, heparin-coated circuits (Duraflo II) and reduced systemic heparinization (ACT > 250s) were used. In group NC, non-coated circuits and standard heparin administration (ACT > 480s) were used. Adherent monocytes retrieved from the oxygenators immediately after bypass arrest showed a 2-3-fold increase in TF-PCA when compared to circulating cells pre-CPB (P < 0.01). When cell PCA was expressed as percent change from pre-CPB (baseline) values, circulating monocytes in group NC at CPB-arrest showed a 2-fold increase in PCA compared to group C (P < 0.05). Moreover, the percent increase in PCA of oxygenator-retrieved monocytes was 7-fold in group NC and 2-fold in group C (P < 0.008 and P < 0.004, respectively). Thus, heparin-coating of the extracorporeal circuit reduced induction of adherent cell TF-PCA by 70% (P < 0.05). Thus, monocyte TF-PCA may cause activation of the extrinsic coagulation pathway during CPB surgery. It is apparent that heparin-coating enhanced biocompatibility of extracorporeal circuits. Reduced systemic heparinization in group C proved to be safe. However, further reduction of heparin administration may not be advisable, since monocytes were still activated in the coated oxygenator.

There were no significant differences whether myocardial protection was performed with cold blood cardioplegia or cold crystalloid cardioplegia during aortic crossclamping in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The extra costs related to blood cardioplegia might be saved.

The experience with this patient cohort including mostly low- to medium-risk patients with a relatively short cardiopulmonary bypass time indicates that coronary artery bypass grafting performed with heparin-coated circuits and reduced level of systemic heparinization is safe and results in a very satisfactory clinical course. No signs of clotting or other technical incidents were recorded.

Despite differences in technology, complexity, and effects on biologic markers, no clinical differences were observed between the Carmeda BioActive Surface system and the Duraflo II coating after coronary artery bypass operations. The overall clinical results were favorable in both groups, confirming the safety and feasibility of routine use of heparin-coated circuits in combination with reduced systemic anticoagulation.

No abstract