Purpose: We compared the 1-year outcomes and early surgery-related complications between 1-quadrant and 2-quadrant microhook ab interno trabeculotomy (TLO). Methods: Medical chart extraction was performed on 47 consecutive patients with 1-quadrant incision and 37 consecutive patients with 2-quadrant incision of trabecular meshwork. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to calculate the propensity score to create a 1:1 match for a comparative analysis of 1-year postoperative success. Success was defined as postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) between 5-21 mmHg, >20% IOP reduction from baseline, and no additional glaucoma surgery. Outcome-related covariates were age, glaucoma type, mean deviation of visual field tests, preoperative IOP, the number of preoperative glaucoma eye drops and the presence of combined cataract surgery. Thirty eyes from each group were compared. Results: The median preoperative IOP was not different between the 1-quadrant and 2-quadrant groups (28.5 mmHg, quartile range 23-33.5 versus 27 mmHg, 23.3-30.0, p = 0.47). There was no difference in median postoperative IOP at 1 year (15 mmHg versus 16 mmHg, p = 0.80). The success rate was 73% in the 1-quadrant group versus 70% in the 2-quadrant group (p = 1.00). The 2quadrant group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with transiently elevated IOP (47%) than the 1-quadrant (17%; Fisher's exact test, p = 0.02). There was no difference of hyphema formation (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.18). Conclusion:The 1-year success rate was not significantly different between 1and 2-quadrant incisions of microhook TLO. However, the 2-quadrant TLO showed significantly higher proportion of post-surgical transient IOP elevation.
. Purpose: To evaluate the precision of the IcareONE rebound tonometer, which was developed for self‐measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) and to compare IcareONE measurement with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). Methods: Twenty‐four healthy eyes and 81 glaucomatous eyes were enrolled. IOP measurements (three times per session) with IcareONE were made in a random order by an ophthalmologist (Icare(O)) and by the subject (Icare(S)). Intraclass correlation coefficients (CCs), kappa values and mean values of IOP were compared among the two types of Icare recordings and GAT. Bland–Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between methods. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the subject factors that influenced the discordant measurements between IcareONE and GAT. Results: The mean value of Icare(O) and Icare(S) measurements was 13.5 ± 5.2 and 13.5 ± 5.4 mmHg, respectively, neither of which was significantly different from GAT (13.8 ± 4.4). The intrarater CC of Icare(O) and Icare(S) was 0.968 and 0.885, respectively. The intermethod CC and weighted kappa between Icare(O) and Icare(S) were 0.907 and 0.684, respectively. All pairwise correlations between the two types of IOP measurement showed coefficients of determination >0.8. Bland–Altman analysis did not show any proportional biases. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the differences between GAT and Icare(O) or Icare(S) were positively correlated with central corneal thickness (CCT) and negatively correlated with age. Conclusions: Intraocular pressure measurements with IcareONE by a physician and by the subject showed excellent agreement with GAT measurements; IcareONE measurements between a physician and the subject had high intrarater reliability, and good agreement thicker CCT led IcareONE measurement to overestimate IOP, while higher age caused it to underestimate IOP compared with GAT.
PURPOSE. The present study aimed to assess the ability of en face slab images of maculae to detect residual nerve fiber bundles in eyes with advanced glaucoma.METHODS. This study included 36 eyes with diffuse thinning of the ganglion cell and inner plexiform layers (GCLþIPL). Inclusion criterion was GCLþIPL thickness of <1% of the normative database level as detected using optical coherence tomography (OCT). En face slab images (50-lm thickness) were reconstructed from the macular cube scan data using advanced visualization settings. Thereafter, we assessed the agreement of the locations between hyperreflective nerve fiber bundles and normal points in the Humphrey visual field test 10-2 pattern deviation (PD) plots. Additionally, total deviation (TD) corresponding to hyperreflective and hyporeflective areas was compared. RESULTS.Hyperreflective areas were detected in 31 out of 36 eyes; all 31 eyes exhibited at least one normal PD point despite the substantial GCLþIPL thinning in the macular region. Two eyes with abnormalities in all PD points showed no hyperreflective area. The remaining three eyes had normal PD points despite the lack of high reflectivity areas in the slab images. Therefore, 91.7% of eyes showed agreement between en face slab images and PD plots. Moreover, hyperreflective areas demonstrated significantly better TD than hyporeflective areas.CONCLUSIONS. En face slab images of maculae were able to reveal the residual nerve fiber bundles in the eyes with advanced glaucoma despite the GCLþIPL thickness in the maculae being diffusely and substantially reduced.
Purpose: This study examined the perioperative factors affecting surgical success in ab interno microhook trabeculotomy (lTLO). Methods: A total of 146 consecutive patients who underwent lTLO were included in this retrospective study. We performed Cox proportional hazard modelling by setting surgical success at 1 year as an objective variable. The explanatory variables included age, sex, glaucoma type, preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma drug score, mean deviation (MD) of the Humphrey visual field test, duration of glaucoma drug use, antithrombotic drug use, combined cataract surgery, incision range and diabetes mellitus. Additionally, we performed 1:1 matching using propensity score analysis and compared the perioperative parameters between durations of glaucoma drug use of <4.5 years and ≥ 4.5 years (50 patients each). We defined surgical success as satisfaction of all three criteria: IOP 5-21 mmHg, IOP reduction of ≥20% from the preoperative IOP and no additional glaucoma surgery. Results:The Cox proportional hazard model revealed that a longer duration of anti-glaucoma medication was significantly associated with surgical failure. Propensity score matching analysis showed that the <4.5-year users of antiglaucoma drugs had significantly higher success rates than the ≥4.5-year users (72% versus 52%; p = 0.04). Conclusions: The prolonged use of multiple glaucoma drugs adversely affected the outcome of lTLO at least at 1 year postoperatively.
ObjectiveTo compare the 1-year outcomes of trabeculotomy ab externo (ab externo TLO) and trabeculotomy ab interno using a microhook (ab interno TLO) for glaucoma patients using propensity score analysis.Methods and analysisThe medical charts of 65 consecutive patients who underwent ab externo TLO and those of 69 patients who underwent ab interno TLO were reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to calculate the propensity score using 1:1 matched analysis, which indicates the likelihood of surgical success at 12 months. We set the outcome-related covariates as age, glaucoma type, mean deviation, preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of preoperative glaucoma eye drops and the presence or absence of combined cataract surgery. Fifty eyes per each surgery group were subsequently compared.ResultsThe mean preoperative IOP was 32.5±11.2 mm Hg in the ab externo TLO group and 28.4±7.8 mm Hg in the ab interno TLO group (p=0.08). The mean postoperative IOP at 12 months was 18.3±7.4 mm Hg in the former group and 17.8±6.3 mm Hg in the latter (p=0.91). When surgical success was defined as a postoperative IOP of between 5 and 21 mm Hg with a more than 20% IOP reduction from baseline and no additional glaucoma surgery, the rate at 12 months was 78% in the ab externo TLO group and 74% in the ab interno TLO group (p=1.00).ConclusionThe 1-year success rate was not significantly different between ab externo and ab interno TLO.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.