Healthcare professionals often face clinical and ethical challenges when charged with making decisions related to provision or lack of provision of artificial nutrition and hydration. The intent of this review is to supply a framework of clinical practices, ethical principles, legal precedents, and professional guidelines that will impart information and can assist decision making regarding artificial nutrition and hydration. Comprehensive understanding of the theory and practice of informed consent for competent adults, decisionally incompetent adults, and minors is necessary for making valid clinical judgments and for guiding patients and their families or surrogates in choosing options related to initiating, withholding, or withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration. The framework offered in this review can serve as a basis for evaluation of appropriateness of artificial nutrition and hydration in 3 common conditions in which decision making is particularly challenging: terminal illness, advanced dementia, and a persistent vegetative state. The framework facilitates guidance for institutional policy makers and individual nutrition support professionals dealing with situations in which personal values often create ethical dilemmas related to artificial nutrition and hydration and its utility.

Recent discussion about the care of the terminally ill patient has focused on the appropriateness of withholding and withdrawing food and fluid and on the discomfort of the dehydrated state. Evidence is mounting that suggests that dehydration in this group of people is not painful, but rather may be more comfortable than hydration by means of IV fluids or enteral and parenteral feedings. This study examines the relationship between the experience of hospice nurses in observing terminal dehydration and their perception of this state. The scores for the degree of positive perception of dehydration are compared for the experienced and nonexperienced groups of nurses. This study suggests that those hospice nurses who have observed terminal dehydration have a more positive perception of this state than those who have not.

This prospective clinical study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of spontaneous food/fluid intake on serum sodium and comfort levels in a population of terminal patients (n = 31) receiving clysis or intravenous hydration. The median and mode of serum sodium were within normal limits and 56 percent of the patients were eunatremic. There was no statistically significant difference in comfort scores between predehydration and dehydration phases, and 85 percent had an optimal comfort score. A statistically significant difference was found (p < 0.5) between mean daily comfort scores of those with normal sodium versus those with abnormal sodium; those with hypernatremia were lower but still in the top third comfort levels. Because the sodium was tested using a Chem7, we also were able to calculate the BUN, creatinine, and osmolality. These are presented and compared to other study results. The findings of this study reinforce the belief that fluid depletion in dying patients results in relatively benign symptoms, that serum sodium levels are not always altered with limited intake and that comfort levels can be maintained when the serum sodium is abnormal.