Limitation of Vt and Pl(es) by volume-controlled ventilation could not eliminate harm caused by spontaneous breathing unless the level of spontaneous effort was lowered and local dependent lung stress was reduced.
ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to investigate the ability of contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for assessing regional perfusion in a model of acute lung injury, using dynamic first-pass perfusion CT (DynCT) as the criterion standard and to evaluate if changes in lung perfusion caused by prone ventilation are similarly demonstrated by DECT and DynCT.MethodsThis was an institutional review board–approved study, compliant with guidelines for humane care of laboratory animals. A ventilator-induced lung injury protocol was applied to 6 landrace pigs. Perfused blood volume (PBV) and pulmonary blood flow (PBF) were respectively quantified by DECT and DynCT, in supine and prone positions. The lungs were segmented in equally sized regions of interest, namely, dorsal, middle, and ventral. Perfused blood volume and PBF values were normalized by lung density. Regional air fraction (AF) was assessed by triple-material decomposition DECT. Per-animal correlation between PBV and PBF was assessed with Pearson R. Regional differences in PBV, PBF, and AF were evaluated with 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc linear trend analysis (α = 5%).ResultsMean correlation coefficient between PBV and PBF was 0.70 (range, 0.55–0.98). Higher PBV and PBF values were observed in dorsal versus ventral regions. Dorsal-to-ventral linear trend slopes were −10.24 mL/100 g per zone for PBV (P < 0.001) and −223.0 mL/100 g per minute per zone for PBF (P < 0.001). Prone ventilation also revealed higher PBV and PBF in dorsal versus ventral regions. Dorsal-to-ventral linear trend slopes were −16.16 mL/100 g per zone for PBV (P < 0.001) and −108.2 mL/100 g per minute per zone for PBF (P < 0.001). By contrast, AF was lower in dorsal versus ventral regions in supine position, with dorsal-to-ventral linear trend slope of +5.77%/zone (P < 0.05). Prone ventilation was associated with homogenization of AF distribution among different regions (P = 0.74).ConclusionsDual-energy computed tomography PBV is correlated with DynCT-PBF in a model of acute lung injury, and able to demonstrate regional differences in pulmonary perfusion. Perfusion was higher in the dorsal regions, irrespectively to decubitus, with more homogeneous lung aeration in prone position.
Objective: Discomfort and noncompliance with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) interfaces are
obstacles to NIV success. Total face masks (TFMs) are considered to be a very
comfortable NIV interface. However, due to their large internal volume and
consequent increased CO2 rebreathing, their orifices allow proximal
leaks to enhance CO2 elimination. The ventilators used in the ICU might
not adequately compensate for such leakage. In this study, we attempted to
determine whether ICU ventilators in NIV mode are suitable for use with a leaky
TFM. Methods: This was a bench study carried out in a university research laboratory. Eight ICU
ventilators equipped with NIV mode and one NIV ventilator were connected to a TFM
with major leaks. All were tested at two positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)
levels and three pressure support levels. The variables analyzed were ventilation
trigger, cycling off, total leak, and pressurization. Results: Of the eight ICU ventilators tested, four did not work (autotriggering or
inappropriate turning off due to misdetection of disconnection); three worked with
some problems (low PEEP or high cycling delay); and one worked properly. Conclusions: The majority of the ICU ventilators tested were not suitable for NIV with a leaky
TFM.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.