Objective: To enhance the precision of the risk estimate for breast cancer in hyperprolactinemia patients by collecting more data and pooling our results with available data from former studies in a meta-analysis. Design: Population-based cohort study and meta-analysis of the literature. Methods: Using nationwide registries, we identified all patients with a first-time diagnosis of hyperprolactinemia during 1994-2012 including those with a new breast cancer diagnoses after the start of follow-up. We calculated standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) as a measure of relative risk (RR) using national cancer incidence rates. We performed a meta-analysis, combining data from our study with data in the existing literature. Results: We identified 2457 patients with hyperprolactinemia and 20 breast cancer cases during 19 411 person-years of follow-up, yielding a SIR of 0.99 (95% CI 0.60-1.52). Data from two additional cohort studies were retrieved and analyzed. When the three risk estimates were pooled, the combined RR was 1.04 (95% CI 0.75-1.43). Conclusions: We found no increased risk of breast cancer among patients with hyperprolactinemia.
Background Data on long-term risk of cancer after a postmenopausal bleeding diagnosis are sparse. Methods We used Danish medical registries to conduct a population-based cohort study of women with a first hospital-diagnosed postmenopausal bleeding during 1995–2013. We computed the absolute risk of cancer and the standardised incidence ratio (SIR) comparing the observed cancer incidence with that expected in the general population. Results Among 43,756 women with postmenopausal bleeding, the absolute 1- and 5-year risk of endometrial cancer were 4.66% and 5.18%, respectively. The SIR of endometrial cancer was elevated during 0–3 months (SIR = 330.36 (95% CI: 315.43–345.81)), 3–12 months (SIR = 11.39 (95% CI: 9.79–13.17)), 1–5 years (SIR = 2.55 (95% CI: 2.19–2.94)) and >5 years of follow-up (SIR = 1.63 (95% CI: 1.40–1.90)). All selected gynaecological and urological, gastrointestinal and haematological cancers had elevated 0–3 months SIRs. Beyond 1 year of follow-up the SIRs of ovarian and bladder cancer remained elevated with a 1–5-year SIR of 2.15 (95% CI: 1.71–2.65) and 1.45 (95% CI: 1.14–1.80), respectively. Conclusions In the Danish population, women with a first hospital-diagnosed postmenopausal bleeding have an increased 0–3 months risk of gynaecological, urological, gastrointestinal and haematological cancers. The SIR of endometrial, ovarian and bladder cancer remained elevated for several years.
Objective To examine the risk of urogenital, colorectal, and neurological cancers after a first diagnosis of acute urinary retention. Design Nationwide population based cohort study. Setting All hospitals in Denmark. Participants 75 983 patients aged 50 years or older with a first hospital admission for acute urinary retention during 1995-2017. Main outcome measures Absolute risk of urogenital, colorectal, and neurological cancer and excess risk of these cancers among patients with acute urinary retention compared with the general population. Results The absolute risk of prostate cancer after a first diagnosis of acute urinary retention was 5.1% (n=3198) at three months, 6.7% (n=4233) at one year, and 8.5% (n=5217) at five years. Within three months of follow-up, 218 excess cases of prostate cancer per 1000 person years were detected. An additional 21 excess cases per 1000 person years were detected during three to less than 12 months of follow-up, but beyond 12 months the excess risk was negligible. Within three months of follow-up the excess risk for urinary tract cancer was 56 per 1000 person years, for genital cancer in women was 24 per 1000 person years, for colorectal cancer was 12 per 1000 person years, and for neurological cancer was 2 per 1000 person years. For most of the studied cancers, the excess risk was confined to within three months of follow-up, but the risk of prostate and urinary tract cancer remained increased during three to less than 12 months of follow-up. In women, an excess risk of invasive bladder cancer persisted for several years. Conclusions Acute urinary retention might be a clinical marker for occult urogenital, colorectal, and neurological cancers. Occult cancer should possibly be considered in patients aged 50 years or older presenting with acute urinary retention and no obvious underlying cause.
Globally non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a high-incidence disease. There is a large heterogeneity within NMIBC regarding recurrence-and progression risks, and large-scale studies of treatment patterns and prognoses in an everyday setting could result in NMIBC-subgroup treatment optimization, benefiting both patients and the economy. The Danish national registries provide such an opportunity if the registered procedure codes are valid. Therefore, the aim of the study was to validate the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10) codes of NMIBC treatment used in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Patients and Methods: From the DNPR, we randomly selected 200 NMIBC treatment courses identified by the dates of the course and the codes of transurethral resection of the bladder ((TURB), n = 125), photodynamic diagnosis ((PDD), n = 25), bladder instillation with Bacillus Calmette vaccine ((BCG), n = 25), or bladder instillation with chemotherapy/Mitomycin C ((MMC), n = 25). We used medical record reviews as the reference standard and estimated positive predictive values (PPVs) of all procedure codes and negative predictive values (NPVs) of PDD-and the perioperative single-shot MMC codes. Results: We identified the medical records in 150 (75%) of the 200 treatment courses (149 individual patients).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.