Balanced chromosomal rearrangements (BCRs), including inversions, translocations, and insertions, reorganize large sections of the genome and contribute substantial risk for developmental disorders (DDs). However, the rarity and lack of systematic screening for BCRs in the population has precluded unbiased analyses of the genomic features and mechanisms associated with risk for DDs versus normal developmental outcomes. Here, we sequenced and analyzed 1,420 BCR breakpoints across 710 individuals, including 406 DD cases and the first large-scale collection of 304 control BCR carriers. We found that BCRs were not more likely to disrupt genes in DD cases than controls, but were seven-fold more likely to disrupt genes associated with dominant DDs (21.3% of cases vs. 3.4% of controls; P = 1.60x10-12). Moreover, BCRs that did not disrupt a known DD gene were significantly enriched for breakpoints that altered topologically associated domains (TADs) containing dominant DD genes in cases compared to controls (odds ratio [OR] = 1.43, P = 0.036). We discovered six TADs enriched for noncoding BCRs (false discovery rate < 0.1) that contained known DD genes (MEF2C, FOXG1, SOX9, BCL11A, BCL11B, and SATB2) and represent candidate pathogenic long-range positional effect (LRPE) loci. These six TADs were collectively disrupted in 7.4% of the DD cohort. Phased Hi-C analyses of five cases with noncoding BCR breakpoints localized to one of these putative LRPEs, the 5q14.3 TAD encompassing MEF2C, confirmed extensive disruption to local 3D chromatin structures and reduced frequency of contact between the MEF2C promoter and annotated enhancers. We further identified six genomic features enriched in TADs preferentially disrupted by noncoding BCRs in DD cases versus controls and used these features to build a model to predict TADs at risk for LRPEs across the genome. These results emphasize the potential impact of noncoding structural variants to cause LRPEs in unsolved DD cases, as well as the complex interaction of features associated with predicting intolerance to alteration of three-dimensional chromatin topology.

Assigning single clinical features to their disease-locus in large deletions: the example of chromosome 1q23-25 deletion syndrome.

Background Down syndrome (DS) is caused by the presence of an extra copy of full or partial human chromosome 21 (Hsa21). Partial (segmental) trisomy 21 (PT21) is the duplication of only a delimited region of Hsa21 and can be associated or not to DS: the study of PT21 cases is an invaluable model for addressing genotype–phenotype correlation in DS. Previous works reported systematic reanalyses of 132 subjects with PT21 and allowed the identification of a 34-kb highly restricted DS critical region (HR-DSCR) as the minimal region whose duplication is shared by all PT21 subjects diagnosed with DS. Methods We report clinical data and cytogenetic analysis of two children with PT21, one with DS and the other without DS. Moreover, we performed a systematic bibliographic search for any new PT21 report. Results Clinical and cytogenetic analyses of the two PT21 children have been reported: in Case 1 the duplication involves the whole long arm of Hsa21, except for the last 2.7 Mb, which are deleted as a consequence of an isodicentric 21: the HR-DSCR is within the duplicated regions and the child is diagnosed with DS. In Case 2 the duplication involves 7.1 Mb of distal 21q22, with a deletion of 2.1 Mb of proximal 20p, as a consequence of an unbalanced translocation: the HR-DSCR is not duplicated and the child presents with psychomotor development delay but no clinical signs of DS. Furthermore, two PT21 reports recently published (named Case 3 and 4) have been discussed: Case 3 has DS diagnosis, nearly full trisomy for Hsa21 and a monosomy for the 21q22.3 region. Case 4 is a baby without DS and a 0.56-Mb duplication of 21q22.3. Genotype–phenotype correlation confirmed the presence of three copies of the HR-DSCR in all DS subjects and two copies in all non-DS individuals. Conclusions The results presented here are fully consistent with the hypothesis that the HR-DSCR is critically associated with DS diagnosis. No exception to this pathogenetic model was found. Further studies are needed to detect genetic determinants likely located in the HR-DSCR and possibly responsible for core DS features, in particular intellectual disability.

No abstract

No abstract