Advances in maintenance immunosuppression over the past three decades have improved solid organ transplantation outcomes dramatically. Uninterrupted access to immunosuppression is paramount to minimize rejection and maintain allograft and patient survival. There is no standardized approach to maintenance immunosuppression management. Agents used vary based on transplanted organ, center‐specific protocol, provider expertise, insurance formularies, ability to cover co‐pays, recipient characteristics and tolerability. Published data reflects this heterogeneity. Despite this limitation, maintenance immunosuppression usage cross pollinates between organ groups with standard of care agents often being used off‐label, making medication access a challenge for many transplant recipients. A multidisciplinary panel of American transplant clinicians was formed to review published literature on maintenance immunosuppression with the goal to formulate consensus recommendations for their use in specific organ groups. These consensus recommendations are intended to provide transplant clinicians with a summary of literature on maintenance immunosuppression in the modern era and to support transplant team members working to secure medication access for patients.

No abstract

Many patients who started antiviral therapy with ADV (either as monotherapy or in combination with lamivudine) remain on this agent because they have undetectable viremia, but its future use will probably diminish because of the availability of more potent drugs. ADV is generally well tolerated, though the 10 mg dose is associated with low risk of nephrotoxicity.

Although visceral leishmaniasis is often fatal in the developing world, Leishmania-attributable deaths in Europe are relatively rare and nowadays almost always linked to HIV infection. In Spain, however, a HIV-negative man with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and prednisone treatment was recently hospitalized because of hypotension and asthenia. Although the patient was afebrile, a bone-marrow aspirate, collected after thrombo- and leuco-cytopenia had been observed, was found to contain huge numbers of amastigotes. A course of antileishmanial treatment with meglumine antimoniate was initiated but the patient went into refractory shock and died within 6 h. The significance of this case, in terms of the routine investigation and treatment of immunosuppressed patients who may have leishmaniasis, is discussed.