La investigación se propuso determinar las pruebas de evaluación neuropsicológica más eficaces para niños con discapacidad auditiva mediante revisión sistemática de evidencia científica publicada. El proceso de búsqueda se hizo de mayo a septiembre de 2020, a partir de las bases de datos: Redalyc, Scielo, Ebsco, Hinari y Scopus. Los artículos seleccionados tenían hasta 10 años de publicación. La información sistematizada en la bibliografía posibilitó determinar las pruebas confiables de la evaluación del desarrollo neuropsicológico en pacientes pediátricos con discapacidad auditiva: vocabulario (Test de Vocabulario en Imágenes Peabody), lenguaje (Test de Evaluación Clínica de los Fundamentos del Lenguaje), funcionamiento ejecutivo (Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function y las Pruebas de habilidades cognitivas Woodcock Johnson), inteligencia (Prueba Breve de Inteligencia de Kaufman). Mientras que, la Prueba informatizada AWARD, el Test de Vocabulario de Boston y el de habilidades de reconocimiento de oraciones (HINT) fueron valoradas con menor operatividad.
SpainSUMMARY The macular dazzling test was performed on 240 healthy eyes, classified into six groups according to the ages of the subjects. The test was used to assess both long distance and short distance vision with a simultaneous study of the influence of mydriasis and miosis.The MDT is a test easy to perform, requires a minimum of co-operation by the subject, and gives repeatable results. The MDT values increase significantly as the age of the subject increases. The sex of the subject has no influence on it, and there are no significant differences between a subject's right and left eyes. Mydriasis does not affect the MDT, but miosis reduces the recovery period. All the values are statistically greater for long distance vision than for short distance vision.One of the methods for the subjective exploration of the retina (visual acuity, Amsler table, static perimetry, colour vision) is the Bailliart test.' This test was formulated to determine the functional macular reaction by dazzling the retina and then measuring the length of time which the subject takes to regain the level of visual acuity he had prior to the dazzling. Since what is actually being explored with this method is the function of the macula, we refer to it as the macular dazzling test (MDT). One of the characteristics of the test is the use of induced macular fatigue, like the induced fatigue used for heart studies.2The purpose of the work reported here was to standardise the MDT technique and thus to typify the results for normal subjects, not only for long distance vision as previous authors have donebut also for short distance vision, in addition to studying the influence of the diameter of the pupil on obtaining results. Materials and methodsWe have performed the MDT on 240 healthy eyes. The ages of the subjects ranged from 10 to 69 years, the ratio of the sexes being 50:50. The subjects were divided into age groups as follows: from 10 to 19, 20 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, and 60 to 69 years.Each age group contained 20 subjects, 10 male and 10 Correspondence to Dr D Francisco G6mez-Ulla de Irazazvibal, Hospital General de Galicia, Departamento de Oftalmologia, c/Galeras s/n, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. 209female. In all cases their visual acuity was equal to or greater than 20/25, with or without optical adjustment, and we accepted a refraction defect of not more than 3 dioptres of hypermetropia, myopia, or astigmatism.To produce the dazzle, a Minolta electronic flash, guide no. 20 in meters with 100 ASA, with a 1/2000s flash, was used. A Heuer chronometer was used to measure the recovery time for visual acuity following the dazzling.Long distance visual acuity was explored through the use of Snellen optotypes and short distance vision by means of the Parinaud test. To perform the MDT we followed the method proposed by Lemrini and Carreras.5 The exploration was systematically begun on the right eye, and later continued on the left eye.The subject was instructed to look directly into the light source, and the dazzle was produce...
El estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar el perfil neurocognitivo pacientes pediátricos normoyentes de edades entre 3 a 6 años, con respecto al de niños en ese mismo grupo etario que presentan discapacidad auditiva, los que utilizaban un implante coclear por entre 24 a 36 meses. Para alcanzarlo, se hizo una investigación con diseño no experimental de tipo comparativo y enfoque cuantitativo. Los datos se obtuvieron a partir de los informes neuropsicológicos archivados en las historias clínicas de 10 pacientes preescolares, atendidos en el Centro de Rehabilitación Integral Especializada “CRIE” en la ciudad de Cuenca en 2019, los que se dividieron en dos grupos (uno con los discapacitados auditivos y otros sin esa característica). El instrumento aplicado en esa institución fue el Cuestionario de Madurez Neuropsicológica (CUMANIN). Las diferencias entre los dos grupos resultaron estadísticamente significativas en la mayoría de las escalas valoradas, los niños sin discapacidad auditiva mostraron un desarrollo neurocognitivo superior al resto de los participantes. La correlación entre las dimensiones del desarrollo neurocognitivo: lenguaje expresivo y fluidez verbal, con respecto a la edad en los niños con discapacidad auditiva, cuyas cifras fueron negativas y se enmarcan en la categoría de fuerte o absoluta.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.