No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Soil has an important role in the greenhouse effect as a net source or net sink of greenhouse gases. This study compared CO2 emission from broiler poultry manure (PMB) and hen poultry manure (PMH) in two different soils. A laboratory experiment was conducted to evaluate the decomposition of poultry manure by analysing carbon mineralisation. Jars were filled with soil, sealed, and placed in an incubator for 60 days, with periodic CO2 analysis. Higher emissions were found in soil amended with PMH; cumulative carbon released as CO2 was 800 mg C/kg in soil amended with PMH, and 600 mg C/kg with PMB. Data for cumulative CO2-C released from unamended and amended soils were fitted to four different kinetic models. With poultry manure, there were significant differences in the model parameters that represent the amount of total potentially mineralisable carbon and the mineralisation rate constant. After 60 days, the percentages of organic carbon mineralised for PMH were 40% and 26% for each soil, whereas the percentages were 20% and 12% for PMB.

Keywords:Poultry manure Multi-Species Soil System Enzymatic activities This paper reports the effects produced on the organisms of the soil (plants, invertebrates and microorganisms), after the application of two types of poultry manure (sawdust and straw bed) on an agricultural land. The test was made using a terrestrial microcosm, Multi-Species Soil System (MS3) developed in INIA. There was no difference in the germination for any of the three species of plants considered in the study. The biomass was increased in the wheat (Triticum aestivum) coming from ground treated with both kinds of poultry manure. Oilseed rape (Brasica rapa) was not affected and regarding vetch (Vida sativa) only straw poultry manure showed significant difference. For length only Vicia sativa was affected showing a reduction when straw was exposed to poultry manure. When the effect on invertebrates was studied, we observed a reduction in the number of worms during the test, especially from the ground control (13.7%), higher than in the ground with sawdust poultry manure (6.7%), whereas in the ground with straw poultry manure, there was no reduction. The biomass was affected and at the end of the test it was observed that while the reduction of worms in the ground control was about 48%, the number of those that were in the ground with sawdust poultry manure or straw poultry manure decreased by 41% and 22% respectively. Finally, the effects on microorganisms showed that the enzymatic activities: dehydrogenase (DH) and phosphatase and basal respiration rate increased at the beginning of the test, and the differences were statistically significant compared with the values of the control group. During the test, all these parameters decreased (except DH activities) but they were always higher than in the ground control. This is why it is possible to deduce that the contribution of poultry manure caused an improvement in the conditions of fertilization and also for the soil.