The digestive stability of two natural antioxidant compounds present in virgin olive oil, hydroxytyrosol (HTy) and hydroxytyrosyl acetate (HTy-Ac) and a new series of hydroxytyrosyl ethers (methyl, ethyl and butyl hydroxytyrosyl ethers) was evaluated by a simulated digestion procedure. High recovery of all compounds after gastric digestion was obtained, although they showed a statistically significant lower stability after pancreatic-bile salts digestion. HTy-Ac was partially hydrolyzed into free HTy, whereas after intestinal digestion, HTy was converted into 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid (DOPAC), and HTy-Ac was hydrolyzed to HTy and subsequently transformed into DOPAC. In contrast, no chemical modification of hydroxytyrosyl ethers during in vitro digestion was observed. In summary, HTy, HTy-Ac and hydroxytyrosyl ethers show high and interesting digestive stability and the new synthetic hydroxytyrosyl ethers showed enhanced chemical stability compared to HTy and HTy-Ac.

No abstract

No abstract

At present, two systems have been usually used to identify olive oil aroma: the official panel test, according to the European Union Regulation [1], and the gas chromatographic method and its improvements. However, both types of techniques have two principal disadvantages: They need a long time for analysis and cannot be applied on‐line. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the development of a new device, the so‐called “electronic nose”. The aim of this work is to perform both a review of these techniques used for olive oil sensory analysis and their advantages and disadvantages.