VR is a better option for patients undergoing primary rectal prolapse repair.

The aim of this study was to compare resection rectopexy (RR) with ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR). This institutional review board–approved retrospective study compared patients with rectal prolapse, who underwent RR or VMR from 2009 to 2016. The primary end point was the comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence rates. Seventy-nine RR and 108 VMR patients qualified. Using propensity score matching, the two groups were not significantly different (P = 0.818). There were no differences regarding gender (female 103 vs 72; P = 0.4) and age (59.3 vs 53.9; P = 0.054). Patients in the VMR group had a greater body mass index (25.5 vs 22.9; P = 0.001) and poorer physical status (American Society of Anesthesiologists 3 57.4% vs 41.8%; P = 0.04). The VMR group had more: robotic approaches (69.4% vs 8.9%; P < 0.001), concomitant urogynecological procedures (63 vs 19; P < 0.001), and longer operative time (269 vs 206 minutes; P < 0.001) but a reduced length of stay (2 vs 5 days; P < 0.001). The median follow-up (16 vs 26 months; P = 0.125) and the median time of recurrence (14 vs 38 months; P = 0.163) were similar. No differences were observed for complications or recurrence (10.2% vs 10.1%; P = 0.43). We failed to identify superiority based on surgical technique.

Introduction Diverticular disease of the colon (DDC) is the fifth most common gastrointestinal disease in developed Western countries, with mortality rates of 2.5 per 100,000 inhabitants per year. Objective The objective of this study is to compare the occurrence of complications, conversion rate, use of stoma, deaths and time of hospitalization among patients undergoing rectosigmoidectomy for DDC and patients undergoing the same surgery for other reasons. Method This was an observational retrospective comparative study. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital Felicio Rocho – Minas Gerais, Brazil – and the data were obtained from the same hospital database. Results The groups were classified according to age, gender, presence of comorbidities, and ASA classification. There was no evidence indicating a significant difference between groups. In this analysis, no perioperative complications were observed and there was no need for a stoma, and no deaths or fistulas occurred. Conclusion Elective laparoscopic surgical treatment of DDC in the analyzed group showed no difference in complications, duration of surgery and hospitalization time versus control group. Therefore, the laparoscopic surgical treatment of diverticular disease translates into an excellent tool for both the surgeon and the patient.

No abstract

No abstract