ResumenLa incorporación del Sistema Europeo de Transferencia de Créditos (ECTS) verá sus frutos en breve con la salida al mercado laboral de los primeros egresados. En este estudio se realiza una primera valoración de los resultados obtenidos, analizando si el plan de estudios (grado o licenciatura) y el uso de las nuevas metodologías docentes han marcado diferencias significativas en el rendimiento académico. Los resultados parecen indicar que éste es mayor en los licenciados, y para los alumnos que se han beneficiado de una nueva herramienta pedagógica. Se han considerado los datos de dos promociones, una de doble licenciatura y otra de doble grado. Descartadas, como causas, inputs potencialmente importantes como nivel preuniversitario y opción de bachillerato se plantea, como causa de la disminución del rendimiento, la implantación de los grados con una inversión prácticamente nula, lo que habría supuesto que el alumnado careciera de la disminución de presencialidad requerida para la correcta autogestión académica. Palabras clave: aprendizaje, ECTS, enseñanza, rendimiento, valoración. AbstractThe incorporation of the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) will pay off soon with the release of the first labor market new-plan graduates. In this study an initial assessment of the results is done by analyzing whether the curriculum (new-plan degree or old-plan degree) and the use of new teaching methodologies have led to significant differences in academic performance or if, on the contrary, they did not. These results suggest that this performance is higher for old-plan graduates, and also for those who have benefited from a new pedagogical tool (students from both the old and new plan). Data used corresponds to that from two different classes, one of them from an old-plan double degree and another from a new-plan double degree. Potentially important inputs such as pre-university level and secondary school option were discarded as causes affecting their performance and the implantation of new-plan degrees with virtually no investment is seen as the cause of the performance drop, which would have Revista Complutense de Educación633

No abstract

Una de las características del curso 2019-2020, en la Educación Superior, fue la intensificación del uso de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación como consecuencia de la irrupción del COVID-19. Esta situación se prolongó en el curso 2020-2021, caracterizado por la incertidumbre derivada del cambio de situación sanitaria y un reajuste del tipo de modalidad docente presencial a híbrida u online. Así, este trabajo expone las estrategias adoptadas por el profesorado de asignaturas de diferentes áreas (ciencias sociales e ingenierías) de dos universidades públicas (Universitat de València y Universidad Rey Juan Carlos) para adaptar el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje, así como el alumnado. ' evaluación de la gestión del profesorado. Cabe destacar el volumen de trabajo que ha supuesto la adaptación de la metodología docente, requiriendo la digitalización de algunas actividades, y la disparidad de estrategias según las características de las asignaturas ya que, a modo de ejemplo, el perfil del alumnado en asignaturas obligatorias difiere del de asignaturas optativas. Cuando se encuestó a los alumnos sobre la gestión del profesorado, ésta fue más que aceptable (media de 8,9 sobre 10). Sin embargo, la acogida fue más favorable en las materias optativas que en las obligatorias (media de 9,8 vs. 8,2).-------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- One of the characteristics of the 2019-2020 academic year, in Higher Education, was the intensification of the use of Information and Communication Technologies as a consequence of the irruption of COVID-19. This situation was prolonged in 2020-2021, characterized by the uncertainty derived from the changing health situation and a readjustment of the type of face-to-face teaching modality to hybrid or online. Thus, this work exposes the strategies adopted by the teaching staff of subjects in different areas (social sciences and engineering) of two public universities (Universitat de València and Universidad Rey Juan Carlos) to adapt the teaching-learning process, as well as the students' assessment of the teaching staff's management. It is worth highlighting the volume of work involved in adapting the teaching methodology, requiring the digitalization of some activities, and the disparity of strategies according to the characteristics of the subjects since, as an example, the profile of students in compulsory subjects differs from that of elective subjects. When the students were polled about the management of the teaching staff, it was more than acceptable (average of 8.9 out of 10). However, the reception was more favorable in elective subjects than in compulsory subjects (mean of 9.8 vs. 8.2).

The implementation of the Bologna process in Spanish universities, which has been active for a decade as of this academic year, facilitated the implementation of multiple teaching methodologies where numerous Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and e-learning tools have had a place. Thus, at this point, an analysis ought to be carried out of the impact that their use may have had on the teaching-learning process for the students. The results from such study will allow selecting the tools that could potentially optimize the results of the aforementioned process. Once the best ones among them have been identified, and taking into account their face-to-face or online nature, it will be posible to make a proposal of which teaching methodologies will lead to the best results in three possible scenarios: face-to-face, online or mixed teaching. While most reaserach in this field focuses on the academic performance as the main output to optimize, measured through the student's qualification, the present work aims at taking the student’s opinion into consideration. Therefore, the perception of the students with regards to some pedagogical tools is assessed in this work. Specifically, two tools have been selected: one face-to-face tool (an Audience Response Tool, H.R.A.) and another e-learning one (a hypermedia container) that, logically, does not require attendance. The data collection required for its posterior analysis was carried out through an ad-hoc questionnaire presented to the students of a degree offered by the University of Valencia,. The first results reflect a better reception to H.R.A., with a higher average score (higher than 8), although e-learning is postulated useful for self-evaluation.

No abstract