Purpose Alkaline salinity constrains crop yield. Previously, we observed local adaptation of Arabidopsis thaliana to saline-siliceous soils (pH ≤ 7) and to non-saline carbonate soils. However, no natural population of A. thaliana was localized on saline-alkaline soils. This suggests that salinity tolerance evolved on saline-siliceous soils may not confer tolerance to alkaline salinity. This hypothesis was explored by addressing physiological and molecular responses to alkaline salinity of A. thaliana that differ in tolerance to either non-alkaline salinity or carbonate. Methods A. thaliana native to saline-siliceous soils (high salinity, HS), non-saline carbonate soils (high alkalinity, HA), or soils with intermediate levels of these factors (medium saline-alkalinity, MSA) were cultivated in common gardens on saline-siliceous or saline-calcareous substrates. Hydroponics and irrigation experiments confirmed the phenotypes. The growth, mineral concentrations, proline content, osmotic potential, genetic variation distribution, and expression levels of selected genes involved in salinity and alkalinity tolerance were assessed. Results HS performed best on saline-siliceous soil and in hydroponics with salinity (pH 5.9). However, HS was more sensitive to saline-alkaline conditions than HA and MSA. The fitness under saline-alkaline conditions was ranked according to MSA > HA > HS. Under alkaline salinity, MSA best maintained ion homeostasis, osmotic balance, and higher expression levels of key genes involved in saline or alkaline tolerance (AHA1, root HKT1 and FRO2, and shoot NHX1 and IRT1). Conclusion In A. thaliana, salinity tolerance evolved on saline-siliceous soils does not provide tolerance to alkaline salinity. Plants native to intermediate conditions (MSA) have more plasticity to adapt to alkaline salinity than those locally adapted to these individual stress factors.

Blooming in temperate fruit species is triggered by chilling and heat requirements (CR and HR), with a wide range of requirements within the same species. CR for flower bud dormancy release has become a limiting factor for geographical adaptation of fruit trees in warmer regions. The present study investigated the genetic basis of CR and HR to break dormancy and flowering time (FT) in an almond x peach F2 progeny. FT, HR and CR were evaluated over two consecutive years (2015/2016 and 2016/2017). Seven out of the eight identified quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were found in both periods of analysis. They affected eight traits, and included a consistent QTL for breaking dormancy, CR and HR. Two of them, affecting FT and HR for FT (GDHF), colocalized in G1, and the remaining QTLs, affecting chilling and heat requirements, both influenced by dormancy breaking (DB), were located in G6. These results indicate that factors not related to DB affect flowering time in this population. Implications of the results in peach breeding are discussed.

SUMMARY In nature, multiple stress factors occur simultaneously. The screening of natural diversity panels and subsequent Genome‐Wide Association Studies (GWAS) is a powerful approach to identify genetic components of various stress responses. Here, the nutritional status variation of a set of 270 natural accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana grown on a natural saline‐carbonated soil is evaluated. We report significant natural variation on leaf Na (LNa) and Fe (LFe) concentrations in the studied accessions. Allelic variation in the NINJA and YUC8 genes is associated with LNa diversity, and variation in the ALA3 is associated with LFe diversity. The allelic variation detected in these three genes leads to changes in their mRNA expression and correlates with plant differential growth performance when plants are exposed to alkaline salinity treatment under hydroponic conditions. We propose that YUC8 and NINJA expression patters regulate auxin and jasmonic signaling pathways affecting plant tolerance to alkaline salinity. Finally, we describe an impairment in growth and leaf Fe acquisition associated with differences in root expression of ALA3, encoding a phospholipid translocase active in plasma membrane and the trans Golgi network which directly interacts with proteins essential for the trafficking of PIN auxin transporters, reinforcing the role of phytohormonal processes in regulating ion homeostasis under alkaline salinity.

Purpose Alkaline salinity constrains crop yield. Previously, we found local adaptation of Arabidopsis thaliana demes to saline-siliceous soils (pH≤7) and to non-saline carbonate soils. However, any natural population of A. thaliana was localized on saline-alkaline soils. This suggests that salinity tolerance evolved on saline-siliceous soils may not confer tolerance to alkaline salinity. This hypothesis was explored by addressing physiological and molecular responses to saline-alkaline conditions of A. thaliana demes differing in salinity and carbonate tolerance.Methods A. thaliana native to saline-siliceous soils (G3), to non-saline carbonate soils (G1), or to soils with intermediate levels of these factors (G2) were cultivated in common gardens on saline-siliceous or saline-calcareous substrate. Hydroponics and irrigation experiments confirmed the phenotypes. Growth, mineral concentrations, genome differences, and expression of candidate genes were assessed in the different groups.Results G3 performed best on saline-siliceous soil and in hydroponics with salinity (pH 5.9). However, G3 was more sensitive to saline-alkaline conditions than G1 and G2. Fitness under saline-alkaline conditions was G2 > G1>G3 and G2 best maintained ion homeostasis under alkaline salinity. Whole genome scan did not differentiate among the groups, while distinctive patterns for FRO2, NINJA, and CCB4 were found and confirmed by qPCR.Conclusion In A. thaliana, salinity tolerance evolved on saline-siliceous soils does not provide tolerance to alkaline salinity. Plants from soils with intermediate conditions (G2) have more plasticity to adapt to alkaline salinity than those locally adapted to these individual stress factors. Higher expression of NINJA and CCB4 may contribute to this better adaptation.

More than 70% of land's cultivated area is affected by alkaline salinity stress. Our previous research focused on comparative studies of Arabidopsis thaliana demes with differential performance under neutral (neuSAL) and alkaline salinity (alkSAL) due to local adaptation. Here, an integrated analysis on leaf physiological, nutritional, endogenous phytohormonal and transcriptomic traits was performed to understand differences in the molecular response mechanisms to each salinity type. Higher sensitivity to alkSAL was observed in demes adapted to siliceous soils due to a decreased internal Fe use efficiency, and sequence variation detected at β-CA1 and α-CA1 loci is proposed to contribute to such Fe homeostasis imbalance. Moreover, dissection on DEGs shared by neuSAL and alkSAL confirmed enhanced inhibition of central features on primary and secondary metabolism in these demes under alkSAL. The cell wall and vacuolar β-galactosidase BGAL4 was revealed as a candidate for favoring stress-regulated cell wall rearrangement under neuSAL but not under alkSAL, due to pH-restricted enzymatic activity. Weighted correlation network analysis confirmed the involvement of the identified candidates in co-expression modules significantly correlating with favorable responses to neuSAL and alkSAL. Overall, the present study provides useful insights into key targets for breeding improvement in alkaline saline soils.