Background:
Despite the development of cultural competence models in response to the increase in cultural diversity in the United States, health disparities based on ethnicity and cross-cultural mismatches in health care practices still exist.
Method:
This article critically reviews six noteworthy conceptual models of cultural competence and enlists multilayered definitions of culture from cultural anthropology, critical multicultural education, and critical literary theory, as well as critical discourse analytical tools to deconstruct these frameworks.
Results:
Although these models assist providers to become more culturally sensitive, they can essentialize and oversimplify patients' cultural experience, as well as mask the dynamism and complexities of their communities and power relations.
Conclusion:
Competence implies that practitioners can master diverse cultural experiences. Building on some of the promising practices of these six models and the practices of cultural humility and relational ethics, processes and practices are proposed for practitioners to reconstruct their ongoing cross-cultural work in nursing.
[
J Nurs Educ
. 2020;59(6):311–318.]
While current literacy theories acknowledge the sociocultural and sociopolitical dimensions of literacy learning and teaching, that is, multiliteracies, there exists a gap between theoretical approaches underpinning literacy teaching and assessment. In this dialogue, we re-enact this divergence by collectively defining multiliteracies and deconstructing assessment practices, while speculating on opportunities for reconstruction. Constructing this dialogue across multiple areas of expertise exemplifies multiliteracies because we use critical speaking, listening, writing, reading, and representing, to make sense of our new understandings, and showcase our knowledge construction. Our goal is to explore ways to translate the theories of multiliteracies into assessment practices that make visible children's cognitive-psychological, psycholinguistic, sociocultural, and sociopolitical processes with all kinds of texts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.