Background To determine whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, the cause of COVID-19 disease) exposure in pregnancy, compared to non-exposure, is associated with infection-related obstetric morbidity. Methods We conducted a multicentre prospective study in pregnancy based on a universal antenatal screening program for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Throughout Spain 45 hospitals tested all women at admission on delivery ward using polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) for COVID-19 since late March 2020. The cohort of positive mothers and the concurrent sample of negative mothers was followed up until 6-weeks post-partum. Multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusting for known confounding variables, determined the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of the association of SARS-CoV-2 infection and obstetric outcomes. Main outcome measures: Preterm delivery (primary), premature rupture of membranes and neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Results Among 1009 screened pregnancies, 246 were SARS-CoV-2 positive. Compared to negative mothers (763 cases), SARS-CoV-2 infection increased the odds of preterm birth (34 vs 51, 13.8% vs 6.7%, aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.32–3.36, p = 0.002); iatrogenic preterm delivery was more frequent in infected women (4.9% vs 1.3%, p = 0.001), while the occurrence of spontaneous preterm deliveries was statistically similar (6.1% vs 4.7%). An increased risk of premature rupture of membranes at term (39 vs 75, 15.8% vs 9.8%, aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.11–2.57, p = 0.013) and neonatal intensive care unit admissions (23 vs 18, 9.3% vs 2.4%, aOR 4.62, 95% CI 2.43–8.94, p <  0.001) was also observed in positive mothers. Conclusion This prospective multicentre study demonstrated that pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 have more infection-related obstetric morbidity. This hypothesis merits evaluation of a causal association in further research.

Objective To evaluate the perinatal and maternal outcomes of pregnancies in SARS-CoV-2 infected women, comparing spontaneous and In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) pregnancies (with either own or donor oocytes). Design Multicentre, prospective, observational study. Setting 78 centres participating in the Spanish COVID19 Registry. Patients 1,347 SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women registered consecutively between February 26 th and November 5 th , 2020. Interventions Patient´s information was collected from their medical records, and multivariable regression analyses were performed, controlling for maternal age and the clinical presentation of infection. Main outcome measures Obstetrics and neonatal outcomes, pregnancy comorbidities, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation need and medical conditions. Results The IVF group was composed of 74 (5.5%) women whereas the spontaneous group included 1,275 (94.5%) women. Operative delivery rate was high in all patients, especially in the IVF group, where C-section became the most frequent method of delivery (55.4%, compared to 26.1% of spontaneous). The reason for C-section was induction failure in 56.1% of IVF patients. IVF women had more gestational hypertensive disorders [16.2% vs 4.5% among spontaneous, adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 5.31, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.45-10.93) irrespective of oocyte origin. The higher rate of ICU admittance observed in the IVF group (8.1% vs 2.4% spontaneous) was attributed to pre-eclampsia (aOR 11.82, 95% CI 5.25-25.87), not to the type of conception, Conclusions High rate of operative delivery has been observed in SARS-CoV-2 infected women, especially in IVF pregnancies; method of conception does not affect foetal or maternal outcomes, except for pre-eclampsia.

No abstract

Background Approximately 1% of newborns (NB) require advanced resuscitation (AR) [intubation (ET), and/or chest compression (CC) and/or medication (ME)] at birth. The NRP recommends checking risk factors maternal (MF), intrapartum (IF) and fetal (FF) before each birth (evidence level of expert recommendation) but the need for a team with advanced skills after risk factors have been identified remains undetermined. This imprecision leads to underprovision of expertise which is unsafe or costly overprovision of expertise. Objective To evaluate the relationship of RF and the need for AR in NB ≥34 w gestational age (GA). Design/methods Prospective, case-controlled study conducted in 16 sites (ARG, CHL, USA and BRA) during 18 months. DR management followed NRP guidelines. Eligible cases were NB ≥34 w GA receiving AR at birth and the 4 consecutive NB not requiring AR were selected as controls for the study. Exclusion criteria: prenatal diagnosis of major congenital malformations. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) were used to estimate OR and the associated 95% CI. Results From 61,593 deliveries, 58,429 NB were ≥34w GA (95%). Out of 219 NB receiving AR (0.37%), 23 were excluded, resulting in 196 cases and 784 controls. We found 21 RF