A gap exists between good laboratory practises with axenic animals and procedures applied. This work aimed at choosing the appropriate disinfectant between sodium dichloroisocyanurate (MB-10) and potassium peroxymonosulfate (Virkon^™) disinfectants and to adjust the soaking time of the material used with ISOcage biosafety stations. Another aim was to compare the microbial load on cage systems hosting mice since two weeks in axenic (AR) rooms and typical specific-pathogen-free (SPF) non-axenic rooms (NAR) to identify resistant microorganisms targeted for longer soaking disinfection as well as evaluate microbial concentration reduction procedures in AR. <i>Staphylococcus</i> was the most frequently isolated genus (AR and NAR). An average of three spore-forming microorganisms per cage were counted from AR. The disinfection time to reach 1 log reduction for <i>Bacillus atrophaeus</i> spores varied from 138 (100 ppm MB-10) to 290 (Virkon^™) seconds and below 20 seconds for <i>S. epidermidis</i> (100 ppm MB-10). AR management protocols lead to 1000 times lower microorganisms burden compared to NAR. Data comparing microbial load on SPF and axenic facilities can be used as comparison for facilities aiming at improving the effectiveness of their microbial control procedures.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is continuing to grow across the world. Though often thought of as a mostly public health issue, AMR is also a major agricultural and environmental problem. As such, many researchers refer to it as the preeminent One Health issue. Aerial transport of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria via bioaerosols is still poorly understood. Recent work has highlighted the presence of antibiotic resistance genes in bioaerosols. Emissions of AMR bacteria and genes have been detected from various sources, including wastewater treatment plants, hospitals, and agricultural practices; however, their impacts on the broader environment are poorly understood. Contextualizing the roles of bioaerosols in the dissemination of AMR necessitates a multidisciplinary approach. Environmental factors, industrial and medical practices, as well as ecological principles influence the aerial dissemination of resistant bacteria. This article introduces an ongoing project assessing the presence and fate of AMR in bioaerosols across Canada. Its various sub-studies include the assessment of the emissions of antibiotic resistance genes from many agricultural practices, their long-distance transport, new integrative methods of assessment, and the creation of dissemination models over short and long distances. Results from sub-studies are beginning to be published. Consequently, this paper explains the background behind the development of the various sub-studies and highlight their shared aspects.

The use of axenic animal models in experimental research has exponentially grown in the past few years and the most reliable way for confirming their axenic status remains unclear. It is especially the case when using individual ventilated positive-pressure cages such as the Isocage. This type of cage are at a greater risk of contamination and expose animals to a longer handling process leading to more potential stress when opened compared to isolators. The aim of this study was to propose simple ways to detect microbial contaminants with Isocages type isolator resulting by developing, validating and optimizing three different methods (culture, microscopy, and molecular). These three approaches were also tested in situ by spiking 21 axenic mice with different microorganisms. Our results suggest that the culture method can be used for feces and surface station (IBS) swabs exclusively (in Brain Heart Infusion for 7 days at 25°C and 37°C in aerobic conditions, and at 30°C in anaerobic conditions), while microscopy (wet mounts) and molecular method (quantitative PCR) were only suitable for fecal matter analyses. In situ results suggests that the culture and molecular methods can detect up to 100% of bacterial contamination events while the microscopy approach generates many erroneous results when not performed by a skilled microscopist. In situ results also suggest that when an axenic mouse is contaminated by a microbial agent, the microorganism will colonize the mouse to such an extent that detection is obvious in 4 days, in average. This report validates simple but complimentary tests that can be used for optimal detection of contaminants in axenic animal facilities using Isocage type isolators.