Background Mucormycosis is a rare, invasive disease associated with high mortality rates, produced by opportunistic pathogens related to the Mucorales order and characterised by a diverse range of clinical forms; acute rhino‐orbital‐cerebral and pulmonary symptoms are the most reported ones. Objectives To report the experience of mucormycosis observed in a tertiary‐care hospital in Mexico for 35 years. Methods This was a retrospective, descriptive and observational study on mucormycosis at a tertiary‐care hospital in Mexico from January 1985 to December 2019. Demographic and clinical data and mycological and histopathological records were selected. Results Two hundred fourteen proven cases of mucormycosis for 35 years at a tertiary‐care hospital in Mexico were included. Most of the cases were male patients with a median age of 45 years. The two most associated underlying diseases were diabetes mellitus (76.6%) and haematologic malignancy (15.4%). The three primary clinical forms were as follows: rhino‐orbito‐cerebral (75.9%), cutaneous (8.41%) and pulmonary (7.47%) mucormycosis. The most isolated agents were Rhizopus arrhizus (58.4%) and Lichtheimia corymbifera (12.3%). The overall therapeutic response was 58.5%, and the best response was observed with amphotericin B deoxycholate and surgical debridement. Conclusion Mucormycosis is an emerging disease, and its incidence has increased at our hospital over the years. In this study, the rhino‐cerebral clinical type was the most frequent in patients with uncontrolled diabetes; the main aetiological agent was R. arrhizus. Early diagnosis, control of the underlying disease and prompt management may increase the survival rate.

Background/Objectives: Cutaneous mucormycosis is an emerging opportunistic mycosis caused by Mucorales. It can be divided into primary caused by trauma and secondary by extension of rhino-cerebral and disseminated cases. The objective is to present a retrospective study of cases of mucormycosis with cutaneous involvement.Methods: A retrospective and descriptive study was carried out. Mucormycosis patients were included and divided into two groups: a) Primary Cutaneous and b) Secondary Cutaneous. Mycological tests were performed; the agents were identified by morphology and molecular studies (PCR and sequencing); some cases underwent histopathology. Clinical data and response to treatment were collected.Results: 115 cases were included, 18 of primary, and 97 of secondary cutaneous mucormycosis. Primary cutaneous mucormycosis was most associated with adhesive bands (44.4%) and trauma from traffic accidents (33.3%). The principal clinical form was extensive and deep necrotic ulcers. Secondary cutaneous mucormycosis cases were rhino-cerebral with uncontrolled diabetes (81.4%) The most frequent clinical presentation was necrosis of the eyelid and the nose (65.9%). In both groups, the principal agent was Rhizopus arrhizus, 38.8% and 74.2% respectively. The most effective treatment was the combination of amphotericin B with surgical debridement. The clinical and mycological cure was achieved in 31.0% of primary cases, and 44.4% for secondary cases. Conclusion:Primary cutaneous mucormycosis is caused by implantation of the Mucorales due to trauma or rupture of the cutaneous barrier-breach, and secondary cutaneous mucormycosis develops as part of the rhino-cerebral process. The response to treatment depends on the extension and depth, as well as the predisposing factors.

Aim. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) ranges from mild clinical phenotypes to life-threatening conditions like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). It has been suggested that early liver injury in these patients could be a risk factor for poor outcome. We aimed to identify early biochemical predictive factors related to severe disease development with intensive care requirements in patients with COVID-19. Methods. Data from COVID-19 patients were collected at admission time to our hospital. Differential biochemical factors were identified between seriously ill patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission (ICU patients) versus stable patients without the need for ICU admission (non-ICU patients). Multiple linear regression was applied, then a predictive model of severity called Age-AST-D dimer (AAD) was constructed ( n = 166 ) and validated ( n = 170 ). Results. Derivation cohort: from 166 patients included, there were 27 (16.3%) ICU patients that showed higher levels of liver injury markers ( P < 0.01 ) compared with non-ICU patients: alanine aminotrasnferase (ALT) 225.4 ± 341.2 vs. 41.3 ± 41.1 , aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 325.3 ± 382.4 vs. 52.8 ± 47.1 , lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) 764.6 ± 401.9 vs. 461.0 ± 185.6 , D-dimer (DD) 7765 ± 9109 vs. 1871 ± 4146 , and age 58.6 ± 12.7 vs. 49.1 ± 12.8 . With these finding, a model called Age-AST-DD (AAD), with a cut-point of <2.75 ( sensitivity = 0.797 and specificity = 0.391 , c − statistic = 0.74 ; 95%IC: 0.62-0.86, P < 0.001 ), to predict the risk of need admission to ICU ( OR = 5.8 ; 95% CI: 2.2-15.4, P = 0.001 ), was constructed. Validation cohort: in 170 different patients, the AAD   model < 2.75 ( c − statistic = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70-0.91, P < 0.001 ) adequately predicted the risk ( OR = 8.8 , 95% CI: 3.4-22.6, P < 0.001 ) to be admitted in the ICU (27 patients, 15.95%). Conclusions. The elevation of AST (a possible marker of early liver injury) along with DD and age efficiently predict early (at admission time) probability of ICU admission during the clinical course of COVID-19. The AAD model can improve the comprehensive management of COVID-19 patients, and it could be useful as a triage tool to early classify patients with a high risk of developing a severe clinical course of the disease.

Background By end December of 2021, COVID-19 has infected around 276 million individuals and caused over 5 million deaths worldwide. Infection results in dysregulated systemic inflammation, multi-organ dysfunction, and critical illness. Cells of the central nervous system are also affected, triggering an uncontrolled neuroinflammatory response. Low doses of glucocorticoids, administered orally or intravenously, reduce mortality among moderate and severe COVID-19 patients. However, low doses administered by these routes do not reach therapeutic levels in the CNS. In contrast, intranasally administered dexamethasone can result in therapeutic doses in the CNS even at low doses. Methods This is an approved open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of intranasal versus intravenous dexamethasone administered in low doses to moderate and severe COVID-19 adult patients. The protocol is conducted in five health institutions in Mexico City. A total of 120 patients will be randomized into two groups (intravenous vs. intranasal) at a 1:1 ratio. Both groups will be treated with the corresponding dexamethasone scheme for 10 days. The primary outcome of the study will be clinical improvement, defined as a statistically significant reduction in the NEWS-2 score of patients with intranasal versus intravenous dexamethasone administration. The secondary outcome will be the reduction in mortality during hospitalization. Conclusions This protocol is currently in progress to improve the efficacy of the standard therapeutic dexamethasone regimen for moderate and severe COVID-19 patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT04513184. Registered November 12, 2020. Approved by La Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios (COFEPRIS) with identification number DI/20/407/04/36. People are currently being recruited. Graphical abstract

Bloodstream infections due to bacteria are a highly consequential nosocomial occurrences and the organisms responsible for them are usually multidrug-resistant. The aims of this study were to describe the incidence of bacteremia caused by Gram-negative ESKAPE bacilli during the COVID-19 pandemic and characterize the clinical and microbiological findings including antimicrobial resistance. A total of 115 Gram-negative ESKAPE isolates were collected from patients with nosocomial bacteremia (18% of the total bacteremias) in a tertiary care center in Mexico City from February 2020 to January 2021. These isolates were more frequently derived from the Respiratory Diseases Ward (27), followed by the Neurosurgery (12), Intensive Care Unit (11), Internal Medicine (11), and Infectious Diseases Unit (7). The most frequently isolated bacteria were Acinetobacter baumannii (34%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (28%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23%) and Enterobacter spp (16%). A. baumannii showed the highest levels of multidrug-resistance (100%), followed by K. pneumoniae (87%), Enterobacter spp (34%) and P. aeruginosa (20%). The blaCTX-M-15 and blaTEM-1 genes were identified in all beta-lactam-resistant K. pneumoniae (27), while blaTEM-1 was found in 84.6% (33/39) of A. baumannii isolates. The carbapenemase gene blaOXA-398 was predominant among carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (74%, 29/39) and blaOXA-24was detected in four isolates. One P. aeruginosa isolate was blaVIM-2 gene carrier, while two K. pneumoniae and one Enterobacter spp were blaNDM gene carriers. Among colistin-resistant isolates mcr-1 gene was not detected. Clonal diversity was observed in K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp. Two outbreaks caused by A. baumannii ST208 and ST369 were detected, both belonging to the clonal complex CC92 and IC2. A. baumannii was associated with a death rate of 72% (28/32), most of them (86%, 24/28) extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant isolates, mainly in patients with COVID-19 (86%, 24/28) in the Respiratory Diseases Ward. A. baumannii isolates had a higher mortality rate (72%), which was higher in patients with COVID-19. There was no statistically significant association between the multidrug-resistant profile in Gram-negative ESKAPE bacilli and COVID-19 disease. The results point to the important role of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative ESKAPE bacteria causing bacteremia in nosocomial settings before and during the COVID-19 epidemic. Additionally, we were unable to identify a local impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antimicrobial resistance rates, at least in the short term.