In this study, we report the clinical presentation, response to medical treatment, and long-term follow-up of 26 patients with prolactinoma (15 macro- and 11 micro-adenomas) diagnosed at the age of 7-17 yr. All patients were first treated with bromocriptine (BRC) at doses ranging from 2.5-20 mg/day orally. BRC was discontinued for intolerance and/or resistance to the drug and was replaced by quinagolide (CV) at doses ranging from 0.075-0.6 mg/day or by cabergoline at doses ranging from 0.5-3.5 mg/week orally. Two patients received external conventional radiotherapy after surgery. In 7 prepubertal males and 6 females with macroprolactinoma, headache and/or visual defects were the first symptoms. All females presented with primary or secondary amenorrhea. Growth arrest was observed in a male patient with microadenoma, whereas all the remaining patients had normal heights, and pubertal development was appropriate for their age. Spontaneous or provocative galactorrhea was observed in 12 patients (3 males and 9 females) and gynecomastia in 4 males. Mean serum PRL concentration (+/-SE) at the time of diagnosis was 1080 +/- 267 microg/L in patients with macroadenoma and 155 +/- 38 microg/L in patients with microadenoma. In 10 patients, BRC normalized PRL levels and caused variable, but significant, tumor shrinkage. CV normalized PRL concentrations and reduced tumor size in 5 patients. Cabergoline normalized PRL concentrations in 7 of 10 patients resistant to CV. Pregnancy occurred in 2 patients while on treatment. Pregnancies were uncomplicated, and the patients delivered normal newborns at term. Only 4 patients are still moderately hyperprolactinemic. Impairment of other pituitary hormone secretion was documented at the time of diagnosis in 7 patients, 5 of whom underwent surgery. Four patients became GH deficient in adult age. In conclusion, the medical treatment with dopaminergic compounds is effective and safe in patients with prolactinoma with onset in childhood, allowing preservation of the anterior pituitary function.
To evaluate the prevalence of resistance to cabergoline treatment, we studied 120 consecutive de novo patients (56 macroadenoma, 60 microadenoma, 4 nontumoral hyperprolactinemia) treated with cabergoline (CAB) compared with 87 consecutive de novo patients (28 macroadenoma, 44 microadenoma, 15 nontumoral hyperprolactinemia) treated with bromocriptine (BRC) for 24 months. Resistance was evaluated as inability to normalize serum PRL levels (first end point) and to induce tumor shrinkage (second end point).After 24 months, PRL normalization and tumor shrinkage after CAB and BRC treatments, respectively, were obtained in 82.1% and 46.4% of macroprolactinomas (P < 0.001) and in 90% vs. 56.8% of microprolactinomas (P < 0.001). The median doses of CAB and BRC able to fulfill the two criteria of treatment success were 1 mg/wk and 7.5 mg/d in macroprolactinomas, 1 mg/wk and 5 mg/d in microprolactinomas, and 0.5 mg/wk and 3.75 mg/d in nontumoral hyperprolactinemia. Hyperprolactinemia persisted in 17.8% of macroprolactinomas, 10% of microprolactinomas, and after CAB at doses of 5-7 mg/wk and in 53.6% of macroprolactinomas, 43.2% of microprolactinomas, and 20% of nontumoral hyperprolactinemic patients, after BRC at doses of 15-20 mg/d. In these resistant macro-and microprolactinomas, the maximal tumor diameter was reduced by 43.7 ؎ 3.6% and 22.1 ؎ 3.7% and by 59.3 ؎ 7.1% and 4.3 ؎ 2.1% after CAB and BRC, respectively (P < 0.001).In conclusion, long-term CAB treatment induced the successful control of hyperprolactinemia associated with tumor shrinkage in a higher proportion of patients than did BRC treatment. In a small number of patients (i.e. 17.8% of macroprolactinomas and 10% of microprolactinomas), however, CAB treatment did not normalize serum PRL levels despite reducing tumor mass, even at very high doses. Therefore, an absence of tumor shrinkage cannot be considered as end point to indicate resistance to CAB, and increasing the dose of CAB higher than 3 mg/wk does not seem to be helpful in controlling PRL hypersecretion. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86: 5256 -5261, 2001) Patients and Methods PatientsFrom 1996 to 1998, 120 consecutive de novo patients with hyperprolactinemia (90 women and 30 men, aged 15-72 yr) were admitted to our Department and were included into this study after their informed Abbreviations: BRC, Bromocriptine; CAB, cabergoline; CT, computed tomography; DA, dopamine agonist; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Both quinagolide and CAB treatments, induced the normalization of serum PRL levels in the great majority of patients with prolactinoma. Tumour shrinkage was recorded in 22-25% of patients after quinagolide and in 30-31% after CAB treatment
This study evaluated the effects of chronic treatment with cabergoline (CAB), a new, potent and longlasting ergoline-derived dopamine agonist, on seminal¯uid parameters and sexual and gonadal function in hyperprolactinemic males in comparison with the effect of bromocriptine (BRC) treatment.Seventeen males with macroprolactinoma were treated with CAB at a dose of 0.5±1.5 mg/week (n 7), or BRC at a dose of 5±15 mg/day (n 10) for 6 months. Baseline prolactin (PRL) was 925.7 6 522.6 mg/l in the CAB-treated group and 1059.4 6 297.6 mg/l in the BRC-treated group. All the patients suffered from libido impairment, ten from reduced sexual potency, and six had infertility. In ®ve patients provocative bilateral galactorrhea was found.Seminal¯uid analysis, functional seminal tests and penis rigidity and tumescence, measured by nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) using Rigiscan equipment, were assessed before and after 1, 3 and 6 months of CAB or BRC treatment. Hormone pro®les were assessed before and after 15, 30, 60, 90 and 180 days of both treatments.Before treatment, all patients had a low sperm count with oligoasthenospermia, reduced motility and rapid progression with an abnormal morphology and decreased viability, and a low number of erections. After 1 month, serum PRL levels were signi®cantly reduced in both groups of patients (20.6 6 6.6 mg/l during CAB and 256.3 6 115
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.