No abstract

No abstract

Image classification has been one of the most popular tasks in Deep Learning, seeing an abundance of impressive implementations each year. However, there is a lot of criticism tied to promoting complex architectures that continuously push performance metrics higher and higher. Robustness tests can uncover several vulnerabilities and biases which go unnoticed during the typical model evaluation stage. So far, model robustness under distribution shifts has mainly been examined within carefully curated datasets. Nevertheless, such approaches do not test the real response of classifiers in the wild, e.g. when uncurated web-crawled image data of corresponding classes are provided. In our work, we perform fine-grained classification on closely related categories, which are identified with the help of hierarchical knowledge. Extensive experimentation on a variety of convolutional and transformer-based architectures reveals model robustness in this novel setting. Finally, hierarchical knowledge is again employed to evaluate and explain misclassifications, providing an information-rich evaluation scheme adaptable to any classifier.

Recent advancements in visiolinguistic (VL) learning have allowed the development of multiple models and techniques that offer several impressive implementations, able to currently resolve a variety of tasks that require the collaboration of vision and language. Current datasets used for VL pre-training only contain a limited amount of visual and linguistic knowledge, thus significantly limiting the generalization capabilities of many VL models. External knowledge sources such as knowledge graphs (KGs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) are able to cover such generalization gaps by filling in missing knowledge, resulting in the emergence of hybrid architectures. In the current survey, we analyze tasks that have benefited from such hybrid approaches. Moreover, we categorize existing knowledge sources and types, proceeding to discussion regarding the KG vs LLM dilemma and its potential impact to future hybrid approaches.

Visual Question Answering (VQA) has been a popular task that combines vision and language, with numerous relevant implementations in literature. Even though there are some attempts that approach explainability and robustness issues in VQA models, very few of them employ counterfactuals as a means of probing such challenges in a model-agnostic way. In this work, we propose a systematic method for explaining the behavior and investigating the robustness of VQA models through counterfactual perturbations. For this reason, we exploit structured knowledge bases to perform deterministic, optimal and controllable word-level replacements targeting the linguistic modality, and we then evaluate the model's response against such counterfactual inputs. Finally, we qualitatively extract local and global explanations based on counterfactual responses, which are ultimately proven insightful towards interpreting VQA model behaviors. By performing a variety of perturbation types, targeting different parts of speech of the input question, we gain insights to the reasoning of the model, through the comparison of its responses in different adversarial circumstances. Overall, we reveal possible biases in the decision-making process of the model, as well as expected and unexpected patterns, which impact its performance quantitatively and qualitatively, as indicated by our analysis.