The improvement in survival of childhood cancer observed across the past 50 years has resulted in a growing acknowledgment that simply extending the lifespan of survivors is not enough. It is incumbent on both the cancer research and the clinical care communities to also improve the health span of survivors. It is well established that aging adult survivors of childhood cancer are at increased risk of chronic health conditions, relative to the general population. However, as the first generation of survivors age into their 50s and 60s, it has become increasingly evident that this population is also at risk of early onset of physiologic aging. Geriatric measures have uncovered evidence of reduced strength and speed and increased fatigue, all components of frailty, among survivors with a median age of 33 years, which is similar to adults older than 65 years of age in the general population. Furthermore, frailty in survivors independently increased the risk of morbidity and mortality. Although there has been a paucity of research investigating the underlying biologic mechanisms for advanced physiologic age in survivors, results from geriatric populations suggest five biologically plausible mechanisms that may be potentiated by exposure to cancer therapies: increased cellular senescence, reduced telomere length, epigenetic modifications, somatic mutations, and mitochondrial DNA infidelity. There is now a critical need for research to elucidate the biologic mechanisms of premature aging in survivors of childhood cancer. This research could pave the way for new frontiers in the prevention of these life-changing outcomes.

PURPOSE To estimate the prevalence of frailty among childhood cancer survivors and to determine the direct and indirect effects of treatment exposures, lifestyle factors, and severe, disabling, and life-threatening chronic condition on frailty. METHODS Childhood cancer survivors (≥ 5 years since diagnosis), treated between 1970 and 1999 when < 21 years old (n = 10,899; mean age, 37.6 ± 9.4 years; 48% male, 86% white) and siblings were included (n = 2,097; mean age, 42.9 ± 9.4 years). Frailty was defined as ≥ 3 of the following: low lean mass, exhaustion, low energy expenditure, walking limitations, and weakness. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate direct and indirect associations between frailty and treatment exposures, sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, and chronic condition. RESULTS The overall prevalence of frailty among survivors was 3 times higher compared with siblings (6.4%; 95% CI, 4.1% to 8.7%; v 2.2%; 95% CI, 1.2% to 3.2%). Survivors of CNS tumors (9.5%; 95% CI, 5.2% to 13.8%) and bone tumors (8.1%; 95% CI, 5.1% to 11.1%) had the highest prevalence of frailty. Survivors exposed to cranial radiation, pelvic radiation ≥ 34 Gy, abdominal radiation > 40 Gy, cisplatin ≥ 600 mg/m2, amputation, or lung surgery had increased risk for frailty. These associations were partially but not completely attenuated when sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, and chronic conditions were added to multivariable models. Cranial radiation (prevalence ratio [PR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.76), pelvic radiation ≥ 34 Gy (PR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.11), and lung surgery (PR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.28 to 2.38) remained significant after sociodemographic, lifestyle, and chronic conditions were accounted for. CONCLUSION Childhood cancer survivors reported a higher prevalence of frailty compared with siblings. Radiation and lung surgery exposures were associated with increased risk for frailty. Interventions to prevent, delay onset, or remediate chronic disease and/or promote healthy lifestyle are needed to decrease the prevalence of frailty and preserve function in this at-risk population.

Introduction: Ph+ ALL comprises ~5% of childhood and adolescent ALL. Prior to development of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, survival rates were poor. Less than half of patients (pts) survived despite treatment with intensive chemotherapy and frequent use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in first remission (CR1). The Children's Oncology Group (COG) AALL0031 trial (Schultz, JCO 2009) and the EsPhALL trial (Biondi, Lancet Oncology 2012) showed adding imatinib to different intensive chemotherapy backbones improved event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in pediatric Ph+ ALL. Dasatinib is attractive to study in Ph+ ALL because it is a dual ABL/SRC TKI that is 300 times more potent than imatinib in vitro, is active against most ABL1 TKI domain mutations that cause imatinib resistance, and accumulates in the central nervous system (CNS), a sanctuary site for ALL where imatinib penetration is poor. Methods: We conducted a phase 2 trial of dasatinib added to the EsPhALL chemotherapy backbone in pediatric (&gt;1-17.99 years (yrs) of age) Ph+ ALL pts at COG sites in North America and Australia and EsPhALL sites in Italy and the United Kingdom. Protocol therapy added continuous daily dasatinib (60 mg/m2) at day 15 of induction chemotherapy. The study measured minimal residual disease (MRD) by Ig/TCR PCR, flow cytometry, and BCR - ABL1 RT-PCR, with clinical actions based upon a single method, in this hierarchical order. Pts with MRD ≥ 0.05% at the end of block Ib (day 78) and those with MRD 0.005-0.05% at end of Ib who remained MRD positive at any detectable level after three additional high-risk (HR) chemotherapy blocks underwent HSCT in CR1. Dasatinib treatment post HSCT was optional. The remaining pts received chemotherapy plus daily dasatinib for 2 yrs, with cranial irradiation limited to CNS3 pts. The primary study endpoint was 3-year EFS assessed when all patients completed 3 years of follow-up. Results: From April 2012 to May 2014, 109 pts enrolled; 3 did not meet inclusion criteria and received no trial therapy. The median age was 9.0 yrs (range 1-17), 54% were males, and 80% were Caucasian. 71% had CNS1 status at baseline, 24% CNS2, and 5% CNS3. Safety analysis included all treated pts (N=106) and efficacy analysis included all treated Ph+ ALL pts (N=104; 2 pts were retrospectively diagnosed with blast crisis CML). The database lock date was 8/17/16; at this time all pts had completed therapy and 75% had ≥3 yrs of follow-up. Two pts discontinued dasatinib for toxicity (1 allergy and 1 prolonged myelosuppression post HSCT). Nineteen pts met study criteria for HSCT, and 15 received HSCT in CR1 (14.2% of pts). The remaining 91 pts (85.8%) received EsPhALL chemotherapy plus dasatinib without HSCT. Patients tolerated dasatinib combined with chemotherapy well. The primary toxicity was febrile neutropenia and infection: Grade 3+ febrile neutropenia occurred in 75.5% of pts, Grade 3+ sepsis in 18.9%; and Grade 3+ bacteremia in 13.2%. Elevated ALT (21.7%) and AST (10.4%) were the only non-hematologic, non-infectious Grade 3+ adverse events attributed to dasatinib reported in &gt;10% of pts. Relevant Grade 3+ non-hematologic, non-infectious toxicities attributed to dasatinib included pleural effusion (3.8%), edema (3.8%), hemorrhage (2.8%), and cardiac failure (0.8%). No cases of pulmonary hypertension or pulmonary arterial hypertension were reported. All 104 treated Ph+ ALL pts achieved CR. As of the database lock date, 33 events had occurred including 5 deaths (3 in HR3 and 2 in reinduction) due to proven or suspected infection in the 91 patients receiving chemotherapy plus dasatinib, 2 deaths from infection post-HSCT in the 15 HSCT pts, and 26 relapses (chemotherapy 22/86; HSCT 4/12). Sites of relapse included isolated bone marrow (BM; 14), CNS (4), BM+CNS (3), BM+other (2), and other (3). At the time of the interim analysis the 3-yr EFS is 66.0% (95% CI, 54.8-75.0) and the 3-yr OS is 92.3% (95% CI, 85.2-96.1); updated results with all patients having at least 3 years of follow-up will be presented. Conclusions: Addition of dasatinib to the EsPhALL chemotherapy regimen is safe and effective in pediatric Ph+ ALL pts. With only 14% of pts undergoing SCT in CR1, as compared to 80% in the EsPhALL imatinib trial, this trial demonstrates similar outcomes with 3-yr EFS/OS 66.0%/92.3% in this trial vs. published 4-yr EFS/OS 61.9%/72.1% in the EsPhALL imatinib trial. Disclosures Hunger: Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Erytech Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Saha: Shire: Research Funding. Gastier Foster: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Cazzaniga: Italian Association for Cancer Research: Research Funding; Fondazione Tettamanti onlus: Employment. Borowitz: Beckman Coulter: Honoraria; Becton-Dickinson Biosciences: Research Funding; HTG Molecular: Honoraria. Gramatges: Bristol Meyer Squibb: Research Funding. Sun: Baxalta: Consultancy. Swanink: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Schrappe: Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; JAZZ Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; SigmaTau: Consultancy, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Research Funding. Healey: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership.