Background and purpose:We recently demonstrated the existence of strain differences in self-administration of the cannabinoid CB 1 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (WIN) by Long Evans (LE) and Lister Hooded (LH) but not Sprague-Dawley (SD) male rats. This follow-up study is aimed at verifying whether sex and ovarian hormones might also be critical factors in the initiation, retention and extinction of WIN self-administration. Experimental approach: LE, LH and SD male and female rats, the latter either intact or bilaterally ovariectomized (OVX), were trained to self-administer WIN (12.5 mg kg À1 per infusion) under a FR1 reinforcement schedule, using lever-pressing. Key results: Data showed that contrary to the findings in SD rats, LE and LH rats developed robust cannabinoid intake, with rates of responding for WIN being constantly higher in intact females than in males ( þ 45 and þ 42% for LE and LH strains, respectively). In comparison with intact females, OVX females of both strains acquired self-administration at lower rates, displaying slower acquisition, lower drug intake (À42 and À52% for LE and LH, respectively) and longer extinction. Conclusions and implications: These findings provide the first evidence of significant sex differences in cannabinoid selfadministration, females acquiring stable WIN intake at higher rates and more rapidly than males. Moreover, when compared to intact females, a lower percentage of LE and LH OVX rats acquired and maintained stable drug intake, suggesting that ovarian hormones might represent a critical factor in modulating the reinforcing effect of cannabinoids.

No abstract

Because opioid and cannabinoid systems have been reported to interact in the modulation of addictive behaviour, this study was aimed at investigating the ability of cannabinoid agents to reinstate or prevent heroin-seeking behaviour after a prolonged period of extinction. In rats previously trained to self-administer heroin intravenously, non-contingent non-reinforced priming administrations of heroin and cannabinoids were presented after long-term extinction, and lever pressing following injections was observed. Results showed that: (i) intravenous priming infusions of heroin (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg) lead to reinstatement of drug-seeking behaviour; (ii) intraperitoneal priming injections of the central cannabinoid receptor agonists R-(+)-(2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-morpholinyl)methyl]pyrol[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazinyl) (1-naphthalenyl)methanonemesylate (WIN 55,212-2, 0.15 and 0.3 mg/kg) and (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4(1,1-dimethyl-heptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl) cyclohexanol (CP 55,940, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg), but not delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC, 0.1-1.0 mg/kg), effectively restored heroin-seeking behaviour; (iii) intraperitoneal priming injection of the central cannabinoid receptor antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichloro-phenyl)4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR 141716A, 0.3 mg/kg) did not reinstate responding, but (iv) completely prevented heroin-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behaviour. Moreover, heroin-seeking behaviour was still present for a few days following cannabinoid primings, indicating a long-lasting effect of cannabinoids on responding for heroin. These findings indicate that relapse to heroin after an extended drug-free period is triggered by cannabinoid agonists and that SR 141716A prevents drug-seeking behaviour, suggesting that the use of the cannabinoid antagonist could have some therapeutic benefits in heroin-induced relapse.