This study assessed the performance of the trauma team leader in 50 consecutive trauma resuscitations at Liverpool Hospital over a two-month period. The trauma team consists of intensive care (ICU), emergency, and surgical registrars, three nurses, a wardsman, a radiographer, and a social worker. The team leader position alternates between the ICU and emergency registrar on a fortnightly roster. A panel of specialists experienced in trauma management evaluated 38 aspects of the initial resuscitation. Individual variables received different weightings. The maximum possible score for team leader performance was 80. The mean team leader score was 70.4 +/- 8 (SD). The main deficiencies in the team leader's performances were in their interpersonal communications and in the adequacy of documentation of the history of the injury. In 20% of resuscitations there were failures to completely expose the patient. Medical skills were uniformly well performed. Poor communication with other team members were the main pitfall of the team leader in this study. The team leader score may prove a useful tool in improving the quality of the trauma team.

Clinical pathways and case management identified areas in need of remedial action and improved the delivery of patient care to our trauma population. It has set a template for the future management of our trauma service.

The present study identified an excellent multidisciplinary trauma response and provides a template to improve performance in early trauma management.

Survival and mortality outcomes for trauma patients admitted to Liverpool Hospital, Sydney were analysed to determine the adequacy of trauma care. TRISS and ASCOT survival probabilities and peer review were utilised to determine if deaths were avoidable. Evaluation methods were compared for assessment of care. During the study period 2205 trauma patients were admitted, 518 of which fulfilled the study entry criteria. There were 38 deaths. The age and Injury Severity Score (ISS) of survivors was 34 +/- 18 years, 9.8 +/- 9 (mean +/- sd) compared to age and ISS for nonsurvivors 37 +/- 22 years and 45 +/- 22*, *p < 0.001. Peer review suggested that 32 deaths were non avoidable, 4 potentially avoidable and 2 were probably avoidable. TRISS and ASCOT survival probabilities were > 0.5 in 16 and 18 patients respectively. TRISS and ASCOT had low positive predictive value (25%) in identifying avoidable deaths. The Z Score was 1.79. The standardised mortality ratio (SMR) was 1.16. The Effectiveness (E) value for outcome was 0.91. Poor communication within the Area Trauma System was the greatest contributor to avoidable deaths. All trauma deaths need peer review rather than solely relying upon ASCOT and TRISS probabilities to identify "unexpected" deaths for detailed review.

This study estimated prospectively the prevalence of high drug and alcohol levels in road trauma cases who met the criteria for activation of the Liverpool Hospital's trauma team. Urine analysis of road trauma victims between October 1992 and October 1993 was undertaken for drug and alcohol estimation.A total of 164 drivers were studied. A urine alcohol concentration (UAC) exceeding 0.08 g/dL was detected in 27 drivers (16.5%). Cannabinoids were detected in the urine of 25 drivers (15.2%). in 17 the concentrations exceeded 400 ng/mL. In one instance amphetamine, cocaine and heroin were detected in the same injured driver. Combined use of alcohol with some other drugs was detected in only four drivers. Alcohol and cannabinoid levels were prevalent in the urine of injured drivers in this study, particularly in young males who remain over‐represented in the group of injured drivers. In the population surveyed other drugs were rarely detected. The role of cannabinoids in road trauma and the use of cannabinoids in young male drivers will however need to be monitored more extensively.