Endothelial cell loss during the first year was similar in eyes with Worst-Fechner and Baikoff ZB5M lenses; however, at 2 years after surgery, endothelial cell loss was higher in eyes with Worst-Fechner lenses than it was in eyes with Baikoff ZB5M lenses.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive stability and the potential long-term risks associated with ZB5M phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation.
METHODS: A retrospective, non-randomized, cumulative clinical study was performed over 12 years in a consecutive group of 225 eyes implanted with the ZB5M PIOL. The main analyzed variables were visual and refractive outcomes (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity [BSCVA], uncorrected visual acuity [UCVA], and spherical equivalent), endothelial cell density, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -17.23±7.69 diopters (D) and 12 years postoperatively it was -1.80+0.80 D. Mean BSCVA at 1- and 12-year follow-up was 0.38±0.19 and 0.57+0.18, respectively (Wilcoxon test, P<.001). At 12 years postoperatively, 3.5% of eyes lost 3*2 lines of BSCVA. An initial 10.6% reduction in endothelial cell density was noted in the first year, followed by a mean annual rate of decrease of 1.78%. The cumulative incidence of pupil ovalization was 34.7% (78 eyes), and there was no statistical correlation with endothelial cell impairment. Bilateral hypertensive uveitis was diagnosed in 3 (1.33%) eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: The ZB5M PIOL offers good refractive outcomes and stability in the long-term; however, endothelial cell loss increases over 12 years, requiring annual endothelial cell counts. [J Refract Surg. 2007;23:147-158.]
We report the spontaneous resolution of a massive detachment of Descemet's membrane 10 months after uneventful phacoemulsification. Diagnosis of the detachment was delayed because of severe corneal edema; thus, surgery was not performed. We propose that this complication of severe corneal edema after cataract surgery be considered and, given its excellent outcome, we recommend surgical treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.