dPneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with poor outcomes and frequently merits empirical antibiotic consideration despite its relatively low incidence. Nasal colonization with MRSA is associated with clinical MRSA infection and can be reliably detected using the nasal swab PCR assay. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the nasal swab MRSA PCR in predicting MRSA pneumonia. A retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary care center from January 2009 to July 2011. All patients with confirmed pneumonia who had both a nasal swab MRSA PCR test and a bacterial culture within predefined time intervals were included in the study. These data were used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for clinically confirmed MRSA pneumonia. Four hundred thirty-five patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of cases were classified as either health care-associated (HCAP) (54.7%) or community-acquired (CAP) (34%) pneumonia. MRSA nasal PCR was positive in 62 (14.3%) cases. MRSA pneumonia was confirmed by culture in 25 (5.7%) cases. The MRSA PCR assay demonstrated 88.0% sensitivity and 90.1% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 35.4% and a negative predictive value of 99.2%. In patients with pneumonia, the MRSA PCR nasal swab has a poor positive predictive value but an excellent negative predictive value for MRSA pneumonia in populations with low MRSA pneumonia incidence. In cases of culture-negative pneumonia where initial empirical antibiotics include an MRSA-active agent, a negative MRSA PCR swab can be reasonably used to guide antibiotic de-escalation. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as an increasingly important pathogen in pulmonary infection, particularly in patients with significant health care exposure. Guidelines for health care-associated pneumonia (HCAP), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) recommend empirical antibiotics targeting MRSA in at-risk patients (1). However, in many cases, cultures are negative and clinicians must determine in whom antibiotics can be safely de-escalated. S. aureus, including MRSA, colonizes the nares (2-6), and colonization has been shown to be a predictor of future clinical infection (7-12). MRSA nasal colonization can be accurately detected using the nasal swab PCR test (13,14). It has been suggested, therefore, that the MRSA PCR nasal swab may be useful as a diagnostic test for patients with infections in whom MRSA is suspected. For this retrospective study, we describe the diagnostic characteristics of the nasal swab MRSA PCR test in predicting culture-confirmed MRSA pneumonia. MATERIALS AND METHODSThe study was performed at a 244-bed academic tertiary care facility. Heart, kidney, liver, pancreas, and bone marrow transplantation are performed at our institution, but no obstetric or pediatric care is provided. Approval for the study was granted by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Bo...

Background Bamlanivimab and casirivimab-imdevimab are authorized for treatment of high-risk patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). We compared the outcomes of patients who received these therapies to identify factors associated with hospitalization and other clinical outcomes. Methods Adult patients who received monoclonal antibody from November 19, 2020 to February 11, 2021 were selected and divided into those who received bamlanivimab (n=2747) and casirivimab-imdevimab (n=849). The 28-day all-cause and COVID-19-related hospitalizations were compared between the groups. Results The population included 3596 patients; median age was 62 years; and 50% were female. All had ≥1 medical comorbidity; 55% had multiple comorbidities. All cause- and COVID-19-related hospitalization rates at 28 days were 3.98% and 2.56%, respectively. After adjusting for medical comorbidities, there was no significant difference in all cause- and COVID-19-related hospitalization rates between bamlanivimab and casirivimab-imdevimab (adjusted HR, 1.4, 95% CI 0.9-2.2 and 1.6, 95% CI 0.8-2.7, respectively). Chronic kidney, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and immunocompromised status were associated with higher likelihood of hospitalization. Conclusion This observational study on the use of bamlanivimab and casirivimab-imdevimab in high-risk patients showed similarly low rates of hospitalization. The number and type of medical comorbidities are associated with hospitalizations after monoclonal antibody treatment.

No abstract

HAdV hepatitis can manifest as a fulminant illness in immunocompromised hosts. Definitive diagnosis requires liver biopsy. Early consideration of a viral etiology, reduction in immunosuppression, and liver transplantation can be potentially life-saving.