Purpose: To assess the importance of treating the patient with choroidal osteoma‐associated neovascular membrane by administering anti‐angiogenic (anti‐VEGF) drugs. Methods:: We present a descriptive study (case report). We have performed a multimodal imaging study of a patient with an inferior temporal peripapillary choroidal osteoma. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was taken in a patient diagnosed with a choroidal osteoma after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound. The patient presented with a decrease in visual acuity and a study using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) revealed a type II neovascular membrane affecting the temporal area of the choroidal osteoma. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed a neurosensory detachment. Results: Serial OCT evaluation revealed a neovascular membrane with associated neurosensory detachment, which was treated with intravitreal injections of Aflibercept, resulting in an MAVC of 0.1 to an MAVC of 0.7 after 2 months. On OCTA we observed disruption of the retinal pigment epithelium. Treatment with monthly injections is required for the first 3 months, with bimonthly treatment for a further 6 months. At present the MAVC is 0.6 and no further injections are required for the time being. Conclusions: Serial multimodality imaging is very useful in the follow‐up of patients with choroidal tumours. It allows us to observe associated complications such as the neovascular membrane that we found in the context of a patient with a choroidal osteoma, a benign bone tumour that mainly affects young women without associated diseases. Despite being benign, it can cause irreversible loss of vision either due to the tumour affecting the macular area or due to complications such as choroidal neovascularisation, which occurs in one third of cases.
Purpose: To report by multimodality imaging the follow‐up of a patient with posterior uveitis presenting serpiginous choroiditis (SC). To highlight the importance of autofluorescence in the follow‐up of patients with atrophic scarring due to CS. Methods: We present an observational case of SC documented photographically. Clinical data were gathered retrospectively from several visits. The data included corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and autofluorescence (AF). Results: Periodic revision of a 49‐year‐old female being followed up for SC secondary to tuberculosis. Mantoux test was positive in 2010 and she was treated correctly. Twelve years later, BCVA was hand movements in the right eye and in the left eye 20/40. Fundus examination revealed no presence of vitritis and atrophic scars post choroiditis serpiginosa. OCT displayed disruption of outer retinal layers. AF revealed atrophy plaque with a new diffuse hypoautofluorescence halo surrounding hyperautofluorescent rim. Aqueous humour and vitreous sample results were negatives. Finally, the lesion was diagnosed as a serpiginous choroiditis. She was treated with corticosteroid and biological therapy to improve her visual acuity. It should suggest a reactivation of SC the appearance of a new atrophy plaque with ill‐defined creamy rim, early block and diffuse oozing at late times, choroidal hypoperfusion, diffuse hypoautofluorescence halo surrounding hyperautofluorescent rim and disruption of outer retinal layers with ellipsoid loss. Conclusions: A differential diagnosis should be made between SC and posterior uveitis secondary to tuberculosis. Multimodal imaging by autofluorescence is important for the diagnosis and follow‐up of patients with atrophic scarring due to SC. Differential diagnosis of cause posterior uveitis is essential for the monitoring and treatment. In inflammatory diseases always rule out infection prior to corticosteroid treatment or biological therapy.
Purpose: Drugs mostly sulfa‐related compounds, have produced uveal effusions, forward rotation of the iris‐lens diaphragm, transient myopia, and secondary angle closure. It has been recently encountered one case in which uveal effusions have occurred after administration of topiramate, a new anticonvulsant medication. Methods: A 54‐year‐old woman was seen in our emergency department with severe headaches, progressively blurry vision and photophobia in both eyes starting that morning. On examination, her visual acuity was hand movement in both eyes. Central corneal edema was observed, narrow chamber and anterior lens‐iris complex displacement with an unreactive middle pupil in both eyes. The funduscopic examination was difficult to assess due to the media opacity. Intraocular pressure measured with an applanation tonometer was 45 mm of mercury (mmHg) in the right eye and 50 mmHg in the left eye. Her medications included topiramate which she had started 2 weeks prior to initial examination due to headaches followed by neurology. Results: Topiramate‐induced angle closure has even been described as an idiosyncratic reaction in patients with normal depth of anterior chamber. The drug causes a prostaglandins increasement that trigger ciliary body edema at the local level but without acting at the systemic level. Ultrasound biomicroscopy shows the presence of a ciliochoroidal effusion syndrome, edema and the ciliary body anterolateral rotation, with zonular relaxation, changes that lead to iris‐lens diaphragm anterior displacement and, as a consequence, narrowing of the responsible anterior chamber with an acute glaucoma crisis. Conclusions: Topiramate is a sulfamate monosaccharide and belongs to a new generation of antiepileptic drugs, widely prescribed throughout the world as treatment of generalized tonic–clonic seizures and partial seizures. Prophylaxis of migraine, bipolar disorder, depression and neuropathic pain are other recent indications of its use. Bilateral acute glaucoma due to uveal effusion syndrome should be considered as an infrequent complication of topiramate use. References. 1. Prithvi S. Sankar, MD; Louis R. Pasquale et al. Uveal Effusion and Secondary Angle‐Closure Glaucoma Associated With Topiramate Use. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(8):1210–1211.
Purpose: To describe an observational case of closed‐angle glaucoma secondary to uveal effusion syndrome after a first episode of posterior scleritis. Methods: Morales Meseguer University Hospital. Ophthalmology service. Uveitis section. Results: A 76‐year‐old woman presented to the emergency department with a red, painful right eye (RO) and decreased visual acuity (VA). Initial VA was light perception and intraocular pressure was 40 mmHg, presenting a narrowed chamber and corticonuclear cataract. The fundus was not assessable due to media opacity. Optical coherence tomography showed choroidal folds in the left eye, and the OD was unapproachable. B‐mode ocular ultrasound showed scleral thickening of 2 mm in both eyes and a superior temporal hematic choroidal detachment in the left eye. She was diagnosed with acute glaucoma secondary to uveal effusion after the first outbreak of posterior scleritis. In the emergency department she was treated with intravenous mannitol, acetazolamide orally and hypotensive eye drops. Acute angle‐closure glaucoma and choroidal detachment remitted under systemic steroid treatment, cycloplegic eye drops and topical hypotensive agents. After screening for pathologies associated with posterior scleritis, idiopathic origin of the condition was concluded. Conclusions: Patients with posterior scleritis may develop uveal effusion syndrome, which can lead to secondary angle‐closure glaucoma. A screening for pathologies associated with posterior scleritis (Wegener's, rheumatoid arthritis, herpes zoster, tumours, porphyria, post‐surgical or pharmacological causes) should be performed, although most cases are idiopathic. Treatment differs from glaucoma due to pupillary block, being necessary the use of systemic corticosteroids.
Purpose: To asses the importance of multimodality imaging in successive examinations of patients with retinal branch vein occlusion in order to evaluate possible unexpected complications. Methods: We present a descriptive study (case report). We have performed a multimodal imaging study of a patient with an inferior temporal branch vein thrombosis. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) is taken in a patient who received 5 intravitreal injections of Ranibizumab. Posteriorly the patient presented with a decrease in visual acuity and the angiographic study showed a venous vasculitis involving the inferior temporal branch retinal vein, resembling frosted branch angiitis. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed inflammatory cystic macular edema with neurosensory detachment. To perform angiography and OCT, we use the Heidelberg Spectralis. Results: Serial evaluation with OCT allowed the observation of a cystic macular edema with neurosensory detachment that was treated with intravitreal Dexamethasone implantation achieving a BCVA of 0.3 to a BCVA of 0.7 after 2 months. Angiography showed a perivenular infiltration that reminded us of frosted branch angiitis. General laboratory tests and serology for cytomegalovirus and Epstein–Barr virus were requested, and the patient was referred to the internal medicine department to rule out systemic diseases. Conclusions: Serial multimodality imaging is very useful in the follow‐up of patients with venous occlusions. It allows us to observe atypical complications such as vasculitis found in the context of a patient who suffered a venous branch occlusion. Vasculitis can be found in the context of an ocular disease or associated with diseases such as Bechet's disease, Sarcoidosis, Multiple Sclerosis, Lupus, Polyarteritis nodosa, Sjogren's disease, Relapsing polychondritis, Antiphospholipid antibodies, Syphilis, Whipple's disease, Cytomegalovirus infection, leukaemia or lymphomas. Despite the growing popularity of OCT, we cannot ignore the importance of fluorescein angiography for the follow‐up of these cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.