Traffic safety and energy efficiency of vehicles are strictly related to driver's behavior. The scientific literature has investigated on some specific dynamic parameters that, among the others, can be used as a measure of unsafe or aggressive driving style such as longitudinal and lateral acceleration of vehicle. Moreover, the use of modern mobile devices (smartphones and tablets), and their internal sensors (GPS receivers, three-axes accelerometers), allows road users to receive real time information and feedback that can be useful to increase awareness of drivers and promote safety. This paper focuses on the development of a prototype mobile application that can evaluate the grade of safety that drivers are keeping on the road by measuring of accelerations (longitudinal and lateral) and warning for users when it can be convenient to correct their driving style. The aggressiveness is evaluated by plotting vehicle's acceleration on a g-g diagram specially studied and designed, where horizontal and lateral acceleration is displayed inside areas of "Good Driving Style". Several experimental tests were carried out with different drivers and cars in order to estimate the system accuracy and the usability of the application. This work is part of the wider research project M2M, Mobile to Mobility: Information and communication technology systems for road traffic safety (PON National Operational Program for Research and Competitiveness 2007-2013) which is based on the use of mobile sensor computing systems for giving real-time information in order to reduce risks and to make the transportation system more safe and comfortable.
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are mechanical supports used in case of heart failure. Little is known as the height of the anastomosis in aorta might influence the hemodynamic. The aim of the study was to evaluate the fluid dynamic behavior due to the outflow graft placement of a continuous flow LVAD in ascending aorta and to identify the insertion site with the best hemodynamic profile. Computational fluid dynamic studies were carried out to analyze 4 different anastomosis locations in a patient-specific aorta 3D model coupled with a lumped parameters model: 1 cm (case 1), 2 cm (case 2), 3 cm (case 3) and 4 cm (case 4) above the ST junction. In cases 1 and 2, epiaortic vessels presented a steady flow, while in cases 3 and 4 the flow was whirling. Moreover, maximum velocity occurred before: brachiocephalic trunk (case 1), brachiocephalic and left carotid arteries (case 2), left carotid and left subclavian artery (case 3) and left subclavian vessel and upper wall of aortic arch (case 4). Maximum time averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) was located in: the ascending aorta (cases 1 and 2), the inferior curvature of the arch (case 3); at the origin of epiaortic vessels (case 4). Furthermore, a flow recirculation (cases 1 and 2), a blood stagnation and chaotic flow (cases 3 and 4) occurred above the aortic valve. The results suggested that the placement of the outflow graft at 2 cm above the ST junction gave the most favorable hemodynamic profile.
In the modern era, stroke remains a main cause of morbidity after cardiac surgery despite continuing improvements in the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) techniques. The aim of the current work was to numerically investigate the blood flow in aorta and epiaortic vessels during standard and pulsed CPB, obtained with the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). A multi-scale model, realized coupling a 3D computational fluid dynamics study with a 0D model, was developed and validated with in vivo data. The presence of IABP improved the flow pattern directed towards the epiaortic vessels with a mean flow increase of 6.3% and reduced flow vorticity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.