ObjectivesHospice and home palliative care have been associated to a reduction of aggressive treatments in the end-of-life, but data in the Italian context are scanty. Therefore, we aim to investigate the role of palliative care on indicators of end-of-life intensity of care among patients with cancer in Lombardy, the largest Italian region.MethodsWithin a retrospective study using the healthcare utilisation databases of Lombardy, Italy, we selected all residents who died in 2019 with a diagnosis of cancer. We considered as exposure variables admission to palliative care and time at palliative care admission, and as indicators of aggressive care hospitalisations, diagnostic/therapeutic procedures, in-hospital death, emergency department visits and chemotherapy over a time window of 30 days before death; chemotherapy in the last 14 days was also considered.ResultsOur cohort included 26 539 individuals; of these, 14 320 (54%) were admitted to palliative care before death. Individuals who were admitted to palliative care had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.27 for one hospitalisation, 0.14 for ≥2 hospitalisations, 0.25 for hospital stay ≥12 days, 0.38 for minor diagnostic/therapeutic procedures, 0.18 for major diagnostic/therapeutic procedures, 0.02 for in-hospital death, 0.35 for one emergency department visit, 0.29 for ≥2 emergency department visits and 0.66 for chemotherapy use in the last 30 days; the OR was 0.56 for chemotherapy use in the last 14 days.ConclusionsThis large real-world analysis confirms and further support the importance of palliative care assistance for patients with cancer in the end- of- life; this is associated to a significant reduction in unnecessary treatments.

e20579 Background: Recently, the PORT-C (China) and Lung ART (Europe) trials have been reported for non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) with surgically resected N2 nodal disease subsequently randomized to post-operative radiation (PORT). The two studies noted widely different locoregional relapse (LR) rates in the control arms, 18.3% in PORT-C and 28.1%(46% of recurrences) in Lung ART. We performed a meta-analysis of patients with N0-N2 disease to better understand risk factors for LR, and the possible differences in risk and rates between Asian (AP) vs. non-Asian populations (NAP). Methods: The present systematic review and meta-analysis identified all original studies of curative NSCLC surgical resections which reported risk and rates of LR between January 1st, 2000 and January 10th, 2021. Studies were excluded if patient number was less than 10, if metastatic disease was present, or if any neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation was given. Eighty-seven studies were included; of these, 56 were of high quality (HQ) based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (ratings 7-9). For each risk factor, we derived pooled relative risk (RR) and rate estimates using random-effects models. Results: Overall, the three highest pooled RRs for LR were N2 vs. N0 (RR 3.01), lymphovascular invasion (LVI; 1.92), and advanced T stage (T3-T4) vs. T1 (1.86). For HQ studies, the highest RRs for LR were LVI (1.94), sublobar vs. lobar resection (1.86), and N1 vs. N0 (1.84), but N2 vs N0 was no longer significant (RR 3.0 (95% confidence interval 0.57 -15.61) based on only 2 studies. The RRs for LR were consistent for most factors across geographic areas, although the RRs for male vs. female sex were higher in AP (1.44) than in NAP (1.09). The pooled rate of LR at 5-years was lower in the AP 12.00% (6.92-17.09) vs. NAP 22.66% (17.06 - 28.26), despite similar overall recurrence rates (both LR and distal) at 5 years in both populations: 38.03% (25.15-50.90) in AP and 37.30% (32.44-42.17) in NAP. However, a lower 5-year mortality rate was noted in AP (24.30%, 15.56 -33.03) than in NAP (45.87%, 41.23-50.50). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis found that N2 nodal disease is not a risk factor for LR when considering HQ studies based upon scant data, and confirmed that LR is lower in AP. We propose that prospective evaluation of LR risk factors and rates should be undertaken prior to any other prospective evaluation of PORT because LR may not be dependent upon N2 node status and because LR rates may differ in AP.