No abstract

In the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC, the use of vinorelbine-based regimens may be less efficacious in controlling disease than other combinations. However, since their activity is not related to histology, vinorelbine still has potential as a first-line treatment for NSCLC patients in whom histology has failed to distinguish non-squamous from squamous histotypes. The use of an oral formulation may furthermore improve tolerability and patient compliance. Vinorelbine should be the drug of choice in the adjuvant setting as the vinorelbine/cisplatin doublet is the only regimen so far that has led to a survival gain in two Phase III trials. In patients aged > 70 years, vinorelbine (together with gemcitabine) should furthermore be the reference drug for first- and second-line therapy when single-agent chemotherapy is the treatment of choice. However, new efforts still need to be made to develop oral schedules for NSCLC.

The brain is one of the most frequent sites of metastases in lung cancer patients, whose prognosis is related to the histological, biomolecular and clinical features of the disease. Over the years, the survival has improved significantly with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but there are limited data concerning their efficacy in patients with brain metastases. The aim of this review is to describe the biological mechanisms supporting the use of immunotherapy for brain metastases and the outcomes experienced by lung cancer patients with brain involvement enrolled in Phase III registration trials of ICIs. We also review retrospective data on ICIs alone or combined with brain radiotherapy, and indicate future directions for preclinical and clinical research.

No abstract

Background: To investigate the role of pretreatment lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) as biomarker in PD-L1 ≥50% non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab. Patients & methods: We retrospectively identified 117 patients, divided into 3 prognostic groups according to LIPI score. For each patient, we evaluated 1-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival rate. C-statistic and survival receiver operating characteristic curves were used to study discrimination of LIPI. Results: After a median follow-up of 11.7 months, 1-year OS rate was 60.1%, 35.3% and 28.6%, while 1-year progression-free survival rate was 39.1%, 20.6% and 14.3% in good, intermediate and poor LIPI groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The c-statistic and area under the curve of LIPI were 0.63 and 0.662 for OS and 1-year OS, respectively. Conclusions: Higher LIPI score is related to worse survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab. However, based on c-statistic and area under the curve, LIPI does not represent a good prognostic survival model.