Ocular surface disorders are frequently encountered in patients under sedation and paralyzed patients in intensive care units (ICUs). In the ICUs, treatment is usually focused on the management of organ failures, and eye care becomes a side issue. As a result, ophthalmological complications do occur (incidence ranges from 3.6% to 60%) and are frequently overlooked in this setting. To identify the best available evidence in providing the best eye care to prevent exposure keratopathy, a literature review was performed. The databases of PUBMED, COCHRAN, and EMBASE library were searched. We only looked at higher quality articles. Among various eye care measures that have been advocated to prevent exposure keratopathy, the most effective is the application of polyethylene covers. Early diagnosis and effective treatment will help prevent microbial keratitis and visual loss.

Patients in ICUs frequently require tracheostomy for long-term ventilator support, and the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) method is preferred over surgical tracheostomy. The use of ultrasound (US) imaging to guide ICU procedures and interventions has recently emerged as a simple and noninvasive tool. The current evidence regarding the applications of US in PDT is encouraging; however, the exact role of US-guided dilatational tracheostomy (US-PDT) remains poorly defined. In this review, we describe the best available evidence concerning the safety and efficacy of US-PDT and briefly delineate the general principles of US image generation for the airway and of US-PDT procedures.

BACKGROUNDThe intensive care unit is a dynamic environment, where high numbers of patients cared for by health care workers of different experiences and backgrounds might result in great variability in patient care. Protocol-driven interventions may facilitate timely and uniform care of common problems, like electrolyte disturbances. We prospectively compared protocol-driven (PRD) vs. physician-driven (PHD) electrolyte replacement in adult critically ill patients.PATIENTS AND METHODSIn the first month of the two-month study, potassium, magnesium, and phosphate levels were checked by a physician before ordering replacement (PHD replacement period). Over the second month, ICU nurses proceeded with replacement according to the protocol (PRD replacement period). We collected demographic data, admission diagnosis, number of potassium, magnesium, and phosphate levels done per day, number of low levels per day, number of replacements per day, time between availability of results to ordering replacement, time to starting replacement, post-replacement levels, serum creatinine, replacement dose, arrhythmias and replacement route.RESULTSDuring the PHD replacement period, 43 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were admitted to the ICU, while 44 were admitted during the PRD month. The mean time (minutes) from identifying results to replacement of potassium, phosphate and magnesium was significantly longer with PHD replacement compared with PRD replacement (161, 187, and 189 minutes vs. 19, 26, and 19 minutes) (P<0.0001). The number of replacements needed and not given was also significantly lower in the PRD replacement period compared with the PHD replacement period (2, 4, and 0 compared with 9, 6 and 0) (P<0.05). No patients had high post-replacement serum concentrations of potassium, phosphate or magnesium.CONCLUSIONSThis study shows that a protocol-driven replacement strategy for potassium, magnesium and phosphate is more efficient and as safe as a physician-driven replacement strategy.