Although the use of geriatric assessment (GA) in the allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) setting has been reported, few studies have evaluated the impact of patient-reported function on autologous HCT (autoHCT) outcomes. In this study, GA, including the administration of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) quality of life tool, was performed in 184 patients age 50 years (median age, 61 years; range, 50 to 75 years) before autoHCT. Associations among GA findings, quality of life metrics, and post-transplantation outcomes were evaluated using Cox regression. Indications for autoHCT included multiple myeloma (73%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (20%), and other disorders (7%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28 months, whereas the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. In unadjusted analysis, both PFS and OS were significantly associated with 5 GA components: limitation in instrumental activities of daily living, patient-reported Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and the Physical, Functional, and BMT subscale scores of the FACT-BMT. In multivariate analysis, 3 components-limitation in instrumental activities of daily living, patient-reported KPS, and FACT-BMT Physical subscale-remained predictive of both PFS and OS when adjusted for age, provider-reported KPS, disease status, and HCT comorbidity index. In older adults undergoing autoHCT, limitation in any 1 of 3 patient-reported measures of functional status was independently associated with inferior PFS and OS, even after adjusting for known prognostic factors.

Telehealth involves the use of telecommunication and information technology for the delivery of clinical care and may be a mechanism to alleviate the burden of visits faced by patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Few studies have evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of telehealth visits in the care of HCT patients. We conducted 27 telehealth visits with 25 patients undergoing HCT using a videoconferencing system that allows for realtime, 2-way interactions and administered satisfaction surveys to patients and providers. Of the 25 patients included in the study, 20 (80%) and 5 (20%) were undergoing autologous and allogeneic HCT, respectively. The telehealth visits were distributed as follows: 3 inpatient visits upon admission for HCT; 11 inpatient visits between 2 and 14 days post-HCT; 4 inpatient visits prior to discharge after HCT; 8 outpatient, post-HCT follow-up visits; and 1 handoff to a community oncologist. Out of a total of 54 provider assessments, 7 providers (13%) were unable to complete some part of the physical examination, but no provider reported being unable to manage patients' symptoms through telehealth. Eighty-one percent of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with the telemedicine session. Overall satisfaction was higher among patients than providers (mean scores 4.12 versus 2.64; scale 1 to 5, with 1 = very poor to 5 = excellent). Technological barriers resulting in delays and suboptimal physical examination were largely responsible for provider dissatisfaction. The use of telehealth to deliver comprehensive follow-up care to HCT patients is feasible across different HCT types but is dependent upon quality of data streaming and videoconferencing technologies.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract