Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Introduction: In-hospital pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and appropriate initial management has been associated with improved clinical outcomes. Despite current training, pediatric residents often do not feel confident in their ability to deliver this initial management. This workshop focused on the initial management of critically ill pediatric patients and performance of high-quality CPR. Methods: This hands-on workshop utilized skill stations with low-and medium-fidelity simulators to instruct learners on initial management during the first 5 minutes of a code, including high-quality CPR. It was designed for residents across all levels of training who care for pediatric patients (including pediatrics, medicine-pediatrics, pediatrics, psychiatry, and child psychiatry, family medicine, and emergency medicine residents) and can be adapted for different session durations and group sizes. Results: This workshop was conducted at two separate institutions with a total of 18 resident participants. Participants strongly agreed that this workshop was relevant and effective in teaching the initial assessment and management of the critical pediatric patient, including how to best perform high-quality CPR. Residents further reported high levels of confidence in initially assessing and managing a critically ill patient, describing the markers of high-quality CPR, and performing high-quality CPR. Discussion: This workshop provided residents with additional instruction and practice in the initial management of critically ill pediatric patients in cardiopulmonary arrest. The structure and timeline of this curriculum can be adapted to the needs of the individual institution's program and the number of workshop participants.

Introduction: Unintentional traumatic injury remains the leading cause of pediatric death in the United States. There is wide variation in the assessment and management of pediatric trauma patients in emergency departments. Resident education on trauma evaluation and management is lacking. This workshop focused on developing resident familiarity with the primary and secondary trauma survey in pediatric patients. Methods: This hands-on workshop utilized patient-actors and low-fidelity simulators to instruct learners on the initial assessment of trauma patients during the primary and secondary trauma surveys. It was designed for residents across all levels of training who care for pediatric trauma patients (including pediatrics, medicine-pediatrics, emergency medicine, and family medicine) and adapted for different session durations and learner group sizes. Results: Eighteen residents participated in this workshop at two separate institutions. Participants strongly agreed that the workshop was relevant and effective in teaching the initial primary and secondary trauma survey assessment of pediatric trauma patients. Residents also reported high levels of confidence in performing a primary and secondary trauma survey after participation in the workshop. Discussion: This workshop provided residents with instruction and practice in performing the primary and secondary trauma survey for injured pediatric patients. Additional instruction is needed on assigning Glasgow Coma Scale and AVPU (alert, voice, pain, unresponsive) scores to injured patients. The structure and time line of this curriculum can be adapted to the needs of an individual institution's program and the number of workshop participants.

Objectives: As of December 2020, COVID19 has infected over 13 million Americans and killed over 275,000. Each infection surge leads to increased emergency department (ED) utilization and subsequent critical care admission for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Not all COVID19 patients necessitate a ventilator and therefore can remain at home to minimize infection spread and manage hospital capacity concerns. Remote Bluetooth-enabled pulse-oximeter monitoring of moderate-to-severely ill COVID19 patients can be used to closely monitor symptoms and trigger necessary visits to the hospital. Our objective was to analyze remote pulse-oximeter monitoring cost-effectiveness to reduce facility burden and health expenditures. Methods: We analyzed home-monitoring with pulse-oximetry cost-utility using a Markov model over a 3-week time horizon in daily cycles from a US health sector perspective. Cost and outcome measures were derived from real-world evidence from University Hospitals. Pulse-oximetry monitoring was implemented for patients presenting at the ED with ARDS-like symptoms but not necessitating immediate care; patients were then remotely monitored by experts for up to 4-days until recovery or a second ED visit. Additional parameters were extracted from literature. Costs (2020 U.S. dollars) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were used to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at a $100,000/QALY cost-effectiveness threshold. Model uncertainty was assessed using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: Results demonstrated that pulse-oximetry monitoring dominated current standard care for COVID19 patients based on reduced costs and increased QALYs. Individuals with access to remote pulse-oximetry monitoring averaged $49,176 and 0.03 QALYs, whereas standard care increased costs to $113,792 and 0.02 QALYs. Resulting ICER was not sensitive to uncertainty ranges. Conclusions: Remote pulse-oximetry monitoring of symptomatic COVID19 patients increases the specificity of those requiring immediate followup. We recommend adoption of this technology across health systems to costeffectively manage COVID19 volume surges, maintain patients' comfort, reduce infection spread, and simultaneously monitor multiple patients.