Objectives Since October 2019, SARS-CoV-2 pandemic represents a challenge for the international healthcare system and for the treatment and survival of patients. We normally focus on symptomatic patients, and symptoms can range from the respiratory to the gastrointestinal system. In addition, we consider patients without fever and respiratory symptoms, with both a negative RT nasopharyngeal swab and lung CT, as a “Covid-19 negative patient.” In this article, we present a so called Covid-19 “negative” patient, with an unsuspected vascular clinical onset of the viral infection. Methods An 80 y.o. man, who previously underwent endovascular aortic repair for an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, presented to our department with an atypical presentation of an aorto-enteric fistula during the pandemic. While in hospital, weekly nasopharyngeal swab tests were always negative for SARS-CoV-2. However, the absence of aortic endograft complications, the gross anatomy of duodenal ischemic injury, and the recent history of the patient who lived the last months in Bergamo, the Italian city with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths, lead the senior Author to suspect an occult SARS-CoV-2 infection. The patient underwent to resection of the fourth portion of the duodenum and the first jejunal loop, with subsequent duodenum–jejunal latero-lateral anastomosis and the direct suture of the aortic wall. The intestinal specimen was investigated as suspected SARS-CoV-2 bowel infection by the means of immune-histochemistry (IHC). An ileum sample obtained in the pre-COVID-19 era was used as a control tissue. Results The histological analysis of the bowel revealed sustained wall ischemia and liponecrosis of the duodenal wall, with intramural blood vessels thrombosis. Blood vessel endotheliitis and neo-angiogenesis were also observed. Finally, the IHC was strongly positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA and for HLA-G presence, with a particular concentration both in blood vessels and in the intestinal villi. The control tissue sample was not positive for both SARS-CoV-2 and HLA-G. Conclusions Coronavirus pandemic continues to be an international challenge and more studies and trials must be done to learn its pathogenesis and its complications. As for thromboembolic events caused by SARS-COV-2, vascular surgeons are involved in treatment and prevention of the complications of this syndrome and must be ready with general surgeons to investigate atypical and particular cases such as the one discussed in this article.

Background: Lower limb chronic venous diseases (CVD) lead to possible edema. The aim of the present investigation was to study the effect of thermal aquatic standardize exercise on lower limb edema control in CVD patients assessed by bioimpedance analysis (BIA). Methods: Seventeen patients (34 legs) affected by CVD clinical class CEAP C3,4c,Ep,As,Pr were included. All the cohort performed a standardized exercise protocol in thermal water environment for a total of five sessions. BIA, leg volume, and heart rate at rest were measured. Results: After the five exercise sessions, BIA showed a significant percentage of extracellular water (ECW) reduction from 42.1 ± 5.8 to 41.24 ± 5.5%; p < 0.001. Moreover, an improvement of resistance (p < 0.0009) and reactance (p < 0.009) was assessed. At the same time, the leg volume reduction rate was 15.7%, p <0.0001. A moderate-strong correlation was found between % ECW and leg volume variation (R = 0.59, p < 0.01). Finally, a significant HR at rest reduction was recorded, p < 0.0001. Conclusion: The investigated exercise protocol significantly affects the lower limb volume, and BIA parameters related to the tissue drainage improvement. The correlation founded between the ECW rate and volume variations suggest the possible use of BIA as a biomarker for monitoring the treatments aimed to reduce edema in CVD.

Background Endovenous thermal ablation for chronic venous disease treatment is recommended over traditional surgery. The present investigation compares endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with radiofrequency (RF) for segmental endovenous sapheno–femoral junction ablation. Methods This is a retrospective study in which 79 patients underwent a 6 cm great saphenous vein ablation by RF or by EVLA. Primary outcome was occlusion rate. Secondary outcomes included Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) score, peri-procedural pain, aesthetic satisfaction. Results At 12 ± 1 months recanalization of shrunk tract was recorded in 5/85 (5.8%) cases (2 RF, 3 EVLA) [OR: 1.6; 95%CI: 0.2–10.4; P = 0.6689]. Two cases (1/44 RF group and 1/38 EVLA group) also showed reflux recurrence [OR: 1.0; 95%CI: 0.06–17.8; P = 1.0000]. No significant differences between groups were found in AVVQ, VCSS, peri-procedural pain, or aesthetic satisfaction. Conclusion Saphenous sparing is feasible and effective by means of both EVLA and RF, representing a possible alternative to surgery.

No abstract