BackgroundMicrosatellite markers are widely used for estimating genetic diversity within and differentiation among populations. However, it has rarely been tested whether such estimates are useful proxies for genome-wide patterns of variation and differentiation. Here, we compared microsatellite variation with genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to assess and quantify potential marker-specific biases and derive recommendations for future studies. Overall, we genotyped 180 Arabidopsis halleri individuals from nine populations using 20 microsatellite markers. Twelve of these markers were originally developed for Arabidopsis thaliana (cross-species markers) and eight for A. halleri (species-specific markers). We further characterized 2 million SNPs across the genome with a pooled whole-genome re-sequencing approach (Pool-Seq).ResultsOur analyses revealed that estimates of genetic diversity and differentiation derived from cross-species and species-specific microsatellites differed substantially and that expected microsatellite heterozygosity (SSR-H e) was not significantly correlated with genome-wide SNP diversity estimates (SNP-H e and θ Watterson) in A. halleri. Instead, microsatellite allelic richness (A r) was a better proxy for genome-wide SNP diversity. Estimates of genetic differentiation among populations (F ST) based on both marker types were correlated, but microsatellite-based estimates were significantly larger than those from SNPs. Possible causes include the limited number of microsatellite markers used, marker ascertainment bias, as well as the high variance in microsatellite-derived estimates. In contrast, genome-wide SNP data provided unbiased estimates of genetic diversity independent of whether genome- or only exome-wide SNPs were used. Further, we inferred that a few thousand random SNPs are sufficient to reliably estimate genome-wide diversity and to distinguish among populations differing in genetic variation.ConclusionsWe recommend that future analyses of genetic diversity within and differentiation among populations use randomly selected high-throughput sequencing-based SNP data to draw conclusions on genome-wide diversity patterns. In species comparable to A. halleri, a few thousand SNPs are sufficient to achieve this goal.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3459-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
We investigate the genetic diversity and demographic patterns of the Silene paradoxa group from section Siphonomorpha, which includes the three species S. paradoxa, S. fruticosa and S. aristidis. Eight additional taxa, belonging to the same section, were also included in this study for comparative purposes: S. nutans, S. viridiflora and six species of the italica complex. The nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the two chloroplast spacers trnH-psbA and trnS-trnG show that the paradoxa group constitutes a separate genetic lineage within section Siphonomorpha and includes three well-differentiated species, characterized by different levels of genetic diversity and demographic histories. All three species showed specific haplotypes and ITS variants, intraspecific variation and contrasting demographic histories. S. paradoxa probably followed a demographic expansion scenario, whereas S. fruticosa and S. aristidis most likely went through spatial expansions in the past. Chasmophyte species and species from open rocky habitats are found in both the paradoxa group and the italica complex, suggesting that the switch between the chasmophytic and open habitats occurred at least twice in the Siphonomorpha section.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.