Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore the impact and feasibility of a pilot Community Health Worker (CHW) intervention to improve diabetes management among Bangladeshi-American individuals with Type 2 diabetes living in New York City. Methods Participants were recruited at clinic- and community-based venues. The intervention consisted of six monthly, CHW facilitated group sessions on topics related to management of diabetes. Surveys were collected at baseline and follow-up time points. Study outcomes included clinical, behavioral, and satisfaction measures for participants, as well as qualitative measures from CHWs. Results Improvements were seen in diabetes knowledge, exercise and diet to control diabetes, frequency of checking feet, medication compliance, and self-efficacy of health and physical activity from baseline to 12 months. Additionally, there were decreases in A1C, weight, and BMI. Program evaluation revealed a high acceptability of the intervention, and qualitative findings indicated that CHWs helped overcome barriers and facilitated program outcomes through communal concordance, trust and leadership. Conclusions The intervention demonstrated high acceptability and suggested efficacy in improving diabetes management outcomes among Bangladeshi immigrants in an urban setting. The U.S. Bangladeshi population will continue to increase, and given the high rates of diabetes, as well as linguistic and economic barriers faced by this community, effective and culturally-tailored health interventions are needed to overcome barriers and provide support for diabetes management.
By protecting against cumulative doxorubicin-induced cardiac toxicity, ICRF-187 permits significantly greater doses of doxorubicin to be administered to patients with greater safety.
Studies in animals suggest that the bispiperazinedione ICRF-187 can prevent the development of dose-related doxorubicin-induced cardiac toxicity. In a randomized trial in 92 women with advanced breast cancer, we compared treatment with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FDC), given every 21 days, with the same regimen preceded by administration of ICRF-187 (FDC + ICRF-187). Patients were withdrawn from the study when cardiac toxicity developed or the cancer progressed. The mean cumulative dose of doxorubicin tolerated by patients withdrawn from study was 397.2 mg per square meter of body-surface area in the FDC group and 466.3 mg in the FDC + ICRF-187 group (no significant difference). Eleven patients on the FDC + ICRF-187 arm received cumulative doxorubicin doses above 600 mg per square meter, whereas one receiving FDC was able to remain in the study beyond this dose. Antitumor response rates were similar (FDC vs. FDC + ICRF-187, 3 vs. 4 complete responses; 17 vs. 17 partial responses; and 9.3 vs. 10.3 months to disease progression). Although myelosuppression was slightly greater in the FDC + ICRF-187 group, the incidence of fever, infections, alopecia, nausea and vomiting, or death due to toxicity did not differ between the groups. Cardiac toxicity was evaluated by clinical examination, determination of the left ventricular ejection fraction by multigated nuclear scans, and endomyocardial biopsy. In comparisons of the FDC group with the FDC + ICRF-187 group, clinical congestive heart failure was observed in 11 as compared with 2 patients; the mean decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction was 7 vs. 1 percent when the cumulative dose of doxorubicin was 250 to 399 mg per square meter (P = 0.02), 16 vs. 1 percent at 400 to 499 mg (P = 0.001), and 16 vs. 3 percent at 500 to 599 mg (P = 0.003); and the Billingham biopsy score was 2 or more in 5 of 13 patients undergoing biopsy vs. none of 13 (P = 0.03). We conclude that ICRF-187 offers significant protection against cardiac toxicity caused by doxorubicin, without affecting the antitumor effect of doxorubicin or the incidence of noncardiac toxic reactions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.