Prostate cancer, the most frequently diagnosed cancer in Western men, can display a high variability in term of clinical aggressiveness and prognosis and none of the available markers is able to accurately predict its clinical course. Dystroglycan (DG), a non-integrin adhesion molecule, is a complex formed by two subunits, a-and b-DG, which bind to extracellular matrix molecules and cytoskeleton, respectively. DG expression is frequently reduced in human cancers and has been related to tumor grade and aggressiveness. This study investigated the role of DG in human prostate tumorigenesis and its suitability as a prognostic marker. The expression level of extracellular a-DG subunit was frequently reduced in human prostate cancer cell lines and primary tumors and the percentage of positive tumor cells was significantly further decreased in vivo following androgen ablation therapy (median ¼ 1%) compared to pre-treatment samples (median ¼ 28%). A significant relationship was observed between a-DG staining on the post-treatment samples and tumor recurrence. A dose-and timedependent decrease of DG expression also occurred in human prostate cancer cells following treatment with the anti-androgen flutamide. Stable expression of an exogenous DG cDNA in the LNCaP human prostate carcinoma cell line resulted in a marked inhibition of both anchorage-dependent and independent growth and of the in vivo tumorigenicity. These findings confirm and extend previous evidence that disturbances in the function of the DG complex might contribute to the definition of the malignant behavior of prostate cancer cells and suggest that androgens might regulate DG expression in these cells.
Taken together, these results support a possible anti-cancer and anti-angiogenetic activity of Zol. Our data may not only provide a basis for the clinical use of this drug as preventive agent of bone metastases but also suggest that Zol deserves attention as an anti-cancer agent in non-small-cell lung cancer.
The combination of perioperative chemotherapy plus complete surgical resection is currently accounted as the first-choice strategy in patients with locally advanced Gastric Cancer (LAGC). Nevertheless, the partial response rate makes it necessary to search biological parameters useful to select patients who would benefit most from neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAD-CT). We performed a retrospective analysis on a cohort of 65 LAGC cases, EBV negative and without MMR defect, submitted to perioperative chemotherapy plus surgical resection. We evaluated the neutrophil-lymphocytes ratio (NLR) in peripheral blood, the TILs density (reported as CD4/CD8 tissue ratio) and PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry on bioptic tissues before the treatment. Results were correlated with the biological features, histological response (TRG) and clinical outcome (PFS and OS). We found that NLR, TILs and PD-L1 expression showed a significant correlation with TNM stage, lymphovascular invasion and response to NAD-CT (TRG). Correlating the NLR, TILs and PD-L1 expression with PFS and OS, we found that patients with lower NLR levels (< 2.5 ratio), lower TILs (< 0.2 ratio) and higher PD-L1 level (CPS ≥ 1) had a significantly better PFS and OS than those with higher NLR, higher TILs and lower PD-L1 expression (p < 0.0001). Multivariate and multiple regression analyses confirmed the predictive and prognostic role of all three parameters, especially when all three parameters are combined. Our study demonstrated that pre-treatment NLR, TILs and PD-L1 expression are predictive and prognostic parameters in NAD-CT-treated LAGC suggesting a pivotal role of the systemic and tumor microenvironment immunological profile in the response to chemotherapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.