No abstract

Introduction: Presence of scar at the implantation-site is considered as a major factor in determining the success of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). We aimed at analyzing the predictors of procedural failure in patients with scarred-left ventricle (LV) as demonstrated by cardiac-magnetic resonance-imaging (CMR).Methods: This was a retrospective, observational single-center-study that included consecutive cardiomyopathy patients with LV-scar as demonstrated by lategadolinium-enhancement (LGE) in CMR requiring LBBP. Procedural-failure was defined as the inability to penetrate the septum to reach the LV subendocardium Results: A total of 25 cardiomyopathy patients demonstrated LGE in CMR and were included in the study. LBBP was successful in 16 patients (group-I; 64% acuteprocedural-success). In the remaining 9 patients (group-II) lead could not be penetrated and hence biventricular-pacing was done. LBBP resulted in reduction in QRS-duration and improvement in LV ejection fraction in group-I patients during a mean follow-up of 11.2 ± 3.7 months. Computed-tomography-angiography after LBBP showed the successful lead deployment site (LBBP-Zone) as the overlapping areas of inferior aspect of antero-septum and superior aspect of infero-septum (segment 2/3; AHA-model) in short-axis view(figure -1C). CMR showed LGE in significantly more number of LV-segments and high scar-burden in group-II as compared to group-I (figure-1). A total scar score value of >1.0 predicted failure with 100%-sensitivity and 75%-specificity. CMR revealed transmural-scar in the LBBP-Zone in all patients in group-II (n = 9; 100%). Transmural scar in LBBP-Zone by CMR had 100%-sensitivity and 100%-specificity for predicting the procedural-failure. Conclusion:CMR helps in predicting the procedural failure of LBBP in patients with scarred LV. Presence of transmural-LGE in the LBBP-Zone predicts failure with high sensitivity and specificity.

No abstract

A bstract The present study was done with the objective to know the clinical presentation, microbiological features, and treatment outcome of melioidosis patients in our hospital, which is an emerging infection in India, and to know the differences in clinical course and outcome between bacteremic and nonbacteremic patients. This retrospective observational study was carried out over a period of 5 years from January 2015 to December 2019. Thirty-five cases of culture-confirmed melioidosis were identified with age range between 5 and 74 years. A large number of patients ( n = 31) presented with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Six patients died of septic shock, and the outcome of eight patients was unknown as they were discharged against medical advice. There were no relapses observed. Melioidosis growing as a neglected tropical disease in India warrants awareness among all clinicians across the country. How to cite this article: Ganesan V, Murugan M, Sundaramurthy R, Soundaram GVG. Melioidosis in a Tertiary Care Center from South India: A 5-year Experience. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(3):327–330.