Background Despite an increasing number of smartphone apps, such therapeutic tools have not yet consistently demonstrated their efficacy and many suffer from low retention rates. To ensure the development of efficient apps associated with high adherence, we aimed to identify, through a user-centred design approach, patient and physician expectations of a hypothetical app dedicated to depression. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with physicians (psychiatrists and general practitioners) and patients who had experienced a major depressive episode during the last 12 months using the focus group method. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using qualitative content analysis to define codes, categories and emergent themes. Results A total of 26 physicians and 24 patients were included in the study. The focus groups showed balanced sex and age distributions. Most participants owned a smartphone (83.3% of patients, 96.1% of physicians) and were app users (79.2% of patients and 96.1% of physicians). The qualitative content analysis revealed 3 main themes: content, operating characteristics and barriers to the use of the app. Expected content included the data collected by the app, aiming to provide information about the patient, data provided by the app, gathering psychoeducation elements, therapeutic tools and functionalities to help with the management of daily life and features expected for this tool. The “operating characteristics” theme gathered aims considered for the app, its potential target users, considered modalities of use and considerations around its accessibility and security of use. Finally, barriers to the use of the app included concerns about potential app users, its accessibility, safety, side-effects, utility and functioning. All themes and categories were the same for patients and physicians. Conclusions Physician and patient expectations of a hypothetical smartphone app dedicated to depression are high and confirmed the important role it could play in depression care. The key points expected by the users for such a tool are an easy and intuitive use and a personalised content. They are also waiting for an app that gives information about depression, offers a self-monitoring functionality and helps them in case of emergency.

Background Despite an increasing number of available mental health apps in the bipolar disorder field, these tools remain scarcely implemented in everyday practice and are quickly discontinued by patients after downloading. The aim of this study is to explore adherence characteristics of bipolar disorder patients to dedicated smartphone interventions in research studies. Methods A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Three databases (EMBASE, PsychInfo and MEDLINE) were searched using the following keywords: "bipolar disorder" or "mood disorder" or “bipolar” combined with “digital” or “mobile” or “phone” or “smartphone” or “mHealth” or “ehealth” or "mobile health" or “app” or “mobile-health”. Results Thirteen articles remained in the review after exclusion criteria were applied. Of the 118 eligible studies, 39 did not provide adherence characteristics. Among the selected papers, study length, sample size and definition of measures of adherence were strongly heterogeneous. Activity rates ranged from 58 to 91.6%. Conclusion The adherence of bipolar patients to apps is understudied. Standardised measures of adherence should be defined and systematically evaluated in future studies dedicated to these tools.

IntroductionBipolar Disorder (BD) is a common psychiatric disease. It has been demonstrated a long time ago that bipolar patients are more painful than the healthy subjects. Substance use disorder is a frequent comorbidity in BD, but also in painful patients. The aim of our study was to analyze if bipolar patients with a painful expression have more substance use disorder than bipolar patients without pain.ObjectivesThe aim of our study was to analyze if bipolar patients with a painful expression have more substance use disorder than bipolar patients without painMethodsWe included all bipolar patients from the FACE-BD cohort which is a prospective cohort of French outpatients with BD enrolled at the 12 advanced Centers of Expertise in Bipolar Disorder (CEBD). Pain has been evaluated by the “pain item” of the EQ-5D scale and we divided subjects in four categories: “no pain”, “slight pain”, “moderate pain”, “severe or extreme pain”. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify differences between each pain’s groups according to the kind of substance use disorder, psychiatric comorbidities and clinicals data.ResultsThe cohort enrolled 1897 bipolar patients, 970 had no pain (51.1%), 507 had slight pain (26.7%), 298 had moderate pain (15.7%) and 122 had severe or extreme pain (6.4%). We found significant differences according to age, comorbidities and clinicals data with older, more anxious, and more severe patients more represented in the more painful groups. Painful bipolar patients had also more frequently lifetime substance use disorders (alcohol, opioid, sedative, marijuana) and we were able to characterize different profiles in bipolar patients.ConclusionsBipolar patients with a painful expression had more risks to have a lifetime substance use disorder, an anxiety disorder, and a higher score on MADRS. Interestingly, subjects seemed to prefer substances with anxiolytic or antalgic effects during the acute intoxication as alcohol, marijuana, opioid and sedatives.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

IntroductionMigraine and bipolar disorder (BD) are two chronic and recurrent disorders with a major impact on patient’s quality of life. It is now well known that affective disorders and migraine are often comorbid (Leo et al. Scand J Pain. 2016; 11:136-145). Starting from these observations, we can hypothesis that BD patients with comorbid migraine might have specifical clinical and biological features.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of migraine in a cohort of French BD patients; determine sociodemographic, clinical, and biological features associated BD-migraine comorbidity.Methods4348 BD patients from the FACE-BD cohort were included from 2009 to 2022. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, lifestyle information, and data on antipsychotic treatment and comorbidities were collected, and a blood sample was drawn. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders was used to confirm the diagnosis of BD. Migraine diagnosis was established according to a clinician-assessed questionnaire.Results20.1% of individuals with BD had comorbid migraine. Half of these patients received treatment for migraine. Multivariate logistic regression model showed that risk of migraine in women was nearly twice that in men (OR = 1.758; 95% CI, 1.345-2.298). Anxiety disorder, sleep disturbances and childhood trauma were also associated with an increased risk of migraine comorbidity. Patients receiving antipsychotic treatment had less risk of developing migraine than those not receiving those treatment (OR 0.716, 95% CI, 0.554-0.925), independent of other potential confounders.ConclusionsThe prevalence of migraine in our cohort was lower than those previously reported in other studies. This result might suggest an overestimation of migraine diagnosis in BD patients population studies. However, BD-migraine comorbidity could constitute a subphenotype of bipolar disorder requiring specific treatments.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared