Limited HL is common among people with CKD and independently associated with socio-economic factors and health outcomes. It may represent an important determinant of inequality in CKD.

Managers at all levels must attend to critical social empowerment as well as structural empowerment in order to increase job satisfaction, retention and engagement of highly qualified committed nurses and midwives.

SummaryPaediatric patients who require anticoagulation with therapeutic doses of low-molecular weight heparin are at risk of having a residual anticoagulant effect at the time of surgery, even if managed according to current peri-operative guidelines. Testing for residual effect is not currently recommended in such circumstances. A 15-year-old child with a mechanical aortic valve replacement requiring long-term warfarin treatment, as well as underlying coagulation defects, was administered low-molecular weight heparin for bridging anticoagulation before kyphoscoliosis surgery. Thromboelastography was used intra-operatively to diagnose residual heparinisation, which was demonstrated by a prolonged reaction (R) time of 16.0 min in the plain cup, compared with 9.2 min in the heparinase cup. Subsequently, thromboelastography was also used to monitor haemostatic therapy, which consisted of protamine 2 mg.kg )1 and 500 IU cryoprecipitate. Thromboelastography was used intra-operatively to allow rapid testing of coagulation status and guide therapy, thereby minimising use of blood products and reducing complications. Case reportA 15-year-old boy, weighing 29 kg, was referred to a tertiary level orthopaedic spinal centre for management of his thoracic kyphoscoliosis. The indication for surgery was prevention of further progression of his restrictive

Background Health equity differs from the concept of health inequality by taking into consideration the fairness of an inequality. Inequities may be culturally specific, based on social relations within a society. Measuring these inequities often requires grouping individuals. These groupings can be termed equity stratifiers. The most common groupings affected by health inequalities are summarised by the acronym PROGRESS (Place of residence, Race, Occupation, Gender, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, Social capital). The aim of this review was to examine the use of equity stratifiers in routinely collected health and social care data collections in Ireland. Methods One hundred and twenty data collections were identified from the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) document, “Catalogue of national health and social care data collections: Version 3.0”. Managers of all the data collections included were contacted and a data dictionary was requested where one was not available via the HIQA website. Each of the data dictionaries available was reviewed to identify the equity stratifiers recorded. Results Eighty-three of the 120 data collections were considered eligible to be included for review. Twenty-nine data dictionaries were made available. There was neither a data dictionary available nor a response to our query from data collection managers for twenty-three (27.7%) of the data collections eligible for inclusion. Data dictionaries were from national data collections, regional data collections and national surveys. All data dictionaries contained at least one of the PROGRESS equity stratifiers. National surveys included more equity stratifiers compared with national and regional data collections. Definitions used for recording social groups for the stratifiers examined lacked consistency. Conclusions While there has been much discussion on tackling health inequalities in Ireland in recent years, health and social care data collections do not always record the social groupings that are most commonly affected. In order to address this, it is necessary to consider which equity stratifiers should be used for the Irish population and, subsequently, for agreed stratifiers to be incorporated into routine health data collection. These are lessons that can be shared internationally as other countries begin to address deficits in their use of equity stratifiers.

This article reports the implementation and impact of a standardized systematic evidence-based predictive score for the initial assessment of acutely ill medical patients. The Simple Clinical Score (SCS) was introduced in the A&E department and the medical floor of the authors' hospital between June 2007 and July 2008. The SCS was well received by the staff - 67% felt it greatly improved patient assessment and was very valuable for ensuring appropriate placement of the patient after admission and improved the quality of care. This article describes the change process, the pilot evaluation and the training programme undertaken during the implementation of the SCS. It is hoped that this experience will be of value to other project teams who are undertaking similar initiatives.