Aims: Secretory carcinoma (SC) is characterized by ETV6 rearrangements, most often ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. Given its histologic overlap with other salivary gland tumors (SGTs), SCs can be difficult to diagnose without genetic confirmation. A recently developed pan‐TRK (tropomyosin receptor kinase) antibody shows promise for identifying tumors with NTRK (neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor 3) fusions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of pan‐TRK immunohistochemistry in distinguishing SCs from mimics and selecting patients eligible for TRK inhibitor clinical trials. We examined whole‐tissue sections from 111 SGTs with molecular characterization, including 26 SCs (23 with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion and 3 with ETV6-RET fusion detected by ligation-dependent reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing and 85 non-SC SGTs (no ETV6-NTRK3 fusion). Immunohistochemistry was performed with a pan‐TRK rabbit monoclonal antibody. When any pan‐TRK staining (nuclear or cytoplasmic with any staining intensity) was considered to indicate positivity, 22 of 23 SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion (95.7%) and 33 of 85 non‐SC (38.8%) salivary neoplasms were positive, mainly basal cell adenoma, pleomorphic adenomas, adenoid cystic carcinomas, and epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas. All SCs with ETV6-RET fusion were entirely negative. When only nuclear pan-TRK staining with any staining intensity was considered positive, 18 of 23 SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion (78.3%) were positive, 11 among them with diffuse staining (>30% of cells). All non-SCs and SCs with ETV6-RET fusion were entirely negative. In comparison to molecular analysis (ligation-dependent reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing), nuclear pan-TRK IHC has a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 100% for diagnosing SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion, 69% and 100% for SCs (all fusions). Pan-TRK is a reasonable screening test for diagnosing SCs among SGTs when taking only nuclear staining into account. Although pan-TRK expression is not entirely sensitive for SCs, nuclear staining is highly specific for SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. The lack of pan-TRK immunoreactivity in a subset of SCs is suggestive of atypical exons 4 to 14 or exons 5 to 14 ETV6-NTRK3 fusion or non-NTRK alternative fusion partners such as ETV6-RET. Pan-TRK staining can serve as a strong diagnostic marker to distinguish SC from it mimics and to select patients eligible for TRK inhibitor clinical trials.

Non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas (B-NHLs) are a highly heterogeneous group of mature B-cell malignancies. Their classification thus requires skillful evaluation by expert hematopathologists, but the risk of error remains higher in these tumors than in many other areas of pathology. To facilitate diagnosis, we have thus developed a gene expression assay able to discriminate the seven most frequent B-cell NHL categories. This assay relies on the combination of ligation-dependent RT-PCR and next-generation sequencing, and addresses the expression of more than 130 genetic markers. It was designed to retrieve the main gene expression signatures of B-NHL cells and their microenvironment. The classification is handled by a random forest algorithm which we trained and validated on a large cohort of more than 400 annotated cases of different histology. Its clinical relevance was verified through its capacity to prevent important misclassification in low grade lymphomas and to retrieve clinically important characteristics in high grade lymphomas including the cell-of-origin signatures and the MYC and BCL2 expression levels. This accurate pan-B-NHL predictor, which allows a systematic evaluation of numerous diagnostic and prognostic markers, could thus be proposed as a complement to conventional histology to guide the management of patients and facilitate their stratification into clinical trials.

No abstract