Objective
Hematological treatment decisions in older adults with hematological malignancies are complex. Our objective is to study the impact of a comprehensive geriatric assessment on hematological treatment decision in older patients and the factors associated with change in treatment plan.
Methods
We conducted a cross‐sectional analysis of patients aged 65 years and above with hematological malignancies, hospitalized between 2008 and 2019 at the University Cancer Institute of Toulouse. They were assessed by a geriatrician/nurse team using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). A penalized logistic regression model with elastic net regularization was used to identify factors associated with change in hematological treatment plan.
Results
A total of 424 patients were included. Main hematological malignancies were lymphoma (36.1 %), acute myeloid leukemia (26.9 %) and myelodysplastic syndrome (19.8%). Change in hematological treatment plan was suggested after CGA for 92 patients (21.7%). Factors associated with change in treatment plan were functional impairment according to ADL and IADL scale, mobility impairment, the presence of comorbidity defined by the Charlson score >1 and increasing age.
Conclusion
A CGA has a significant impact on hematological treatment decision in older patients. Functional and mobility impairment, comorbidities and age are predictive factors of change in treatment plan.
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents 30%-40% of adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). 1 DLBCL is a highly aggressive disease, with a limited life expectancy without treatment and a poor prognosis in case of relapse or refractory disease. 2 Its incidence increases with age, with a median age of 70 years at diagnosis. 1 Considering population aging, an increased incidence is expected within the next few years. 3 R-CHOP (Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Oncovin, Prednisone) regimen is widely used as a first-line treatment for this
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.