Advanced cancer is associated with emotional distress, especially depression and feelings of sadness. To date, it is unclear which is the most effective way to address these problems. This review focuses on the effects of psychosocial interventions on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with advanced cancer. It was hypothesised that patients will benefit from psychosocial interventions by improving QoL, especially in the domain of emotional functioning. The review was conducted using systematic review methodology involving a systematic search of the literature published between 1990 and 2002, quality assessment of included studies, systematic data extraction and narrative data synthesis. In all, 10 randomised controlled studies involving 13 trials were included. Overall interventions and outcome measures across studies were heterogeneous. Outcome measures, pertaining to the QoL dimension of emotional functioning, were most frequently measured. A total of 12 trials evaluating behaviour therapy found positive effects on one or more indicators of QoL, for example, depression. The results of the review support recommendation of behaviour therapy in the care of patients with advanced cancer.

Although reports suggest that beliefs about pain play an important role in the adjustment and pain experience of non-cancer patients, the impact of cognitions on the pain experience is unknown in cancer patients. This study examined the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Cognition List-Experimental version, a measure developed to assess patients' self-statements about pain and the extent to which patients are effective in dealing with the pain. The Pain Cognition List-Experimental version was administered to 313 cancer patients during hospitalization. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the adequacy of fit for the original five factors. Because of a failure to replicate the factors, exploratory factor analysis was conducted, finding the factors Pain Impact, Social Comparison, Acquiescence, and Outcome Efficacy. The internal consistency for the factor Pain Impact was high (r = 0.89), while the other three factors showed low reliability. The factor Catastrophizing, usually an important factor in non-cancer patients, did not emerge. No differences were found across sex. The factors Pain Impact and Acquiescence provided evidence for concurrent validity. Patients with district nursing showed higher scores on the factors Pain Impact and Acquiescence, and higher scores on Pain Impact and Acquiescence were associated with higher pain intensity scores. This study was an attempt to evaluate pain cognitions and beliefs in cancer patients. It is concluded that the Pain Cognition List for non-cancer patients cannot be easily used in cancer pain patients and that evaluation of pain cognitions in cancer patients is useful. Health care providers evaluating pain in cancer patients with chronic pain need to be aware of the impact pain cognitions have on patients' pain experience. Although more research is needed, measuring pain cognitions should be considered.