No abstract

Four intrinsically different methods for the determination of the number of active centers were employed in propylene polymerization catalyzed by the typical heterogeneous system TICI, /AlEt,Cl: (i) determination of M, (GPC method) and calculation of number of macromolecules therefrom; (ii) quenching with BuOT and determination of tritium in the polymer; (iii) quenching with CO or CO, and determination of carbonyl groups in the polymer (IR spectroscopy); (iv) quenching with SO, and determination of sulfur in the polymer. The first two methods exhibited a reasonable agreement for the number of active centers. Method (iii) gave much lower values, whereas method (iv) was found to be virtually unsuitable due to a high extent of side reactions of SO, with the polymer. A similar comparison of the methods was made in ethylene polymerization catalyzed by the typical homogeneous systems Cp,TiEtCl/AIEtCl, and Cp,TiEtCl/alumoxane. Method (ii) gave a much lower number of active centers than method (i), due perhaps to a low extent of alcoholysis of the Ti-C bond or to a high kinetic isotope effect. CO, appeared to be entirely inert as a quenching agent and CO had been reported to show side reactions. It follows that none of the above quenching methods have universal application and thus literature data should be considered with caution.

No abstract

Four intrinsically different methods for the determination of the number of active centers were employed in propylene polymerization catalyzed by the typical heterogeneous system TICI, /AlEt,Cl: (i) determination of M, (GPC method) and calculation of number of macromolecules therefrom; (ii) quenching with BuOT and determination of tritium in the polymer; (iii) quenching with CO or CO, and determination of carbonyl groups in the polymer (IR spectroscopy); (iv) quenching with SO, and determination of sulfur in the polymer. The first two methods exhibited a reasonable agreement for the number of active centers. Method (iii) gave much lower values, whereas method (iv) was found to be virtually unsuitable due to a high extent of side reactions of SO, with the polymer. A similar comparison of the methods was made in ethylene polymerization catalyzed by the typical homogeneous systems Cp,TiEtCl/AIEtCl, and Cp,TiEtCl/alumoxane. Method (ii) gave a much lower number of active centers than method (i), due perhaps to a low extent of alcoholysis of the Ti-C bond or to a high kinetic isotope effect. CO, appeared to be entirely inert as a quenching agent and CO had been reported to show side reactions. It follows that none of the above quenching methods have universal application and thus literature data should be considered with caution.

No abstract